Literature DB >> 23212769

Lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty maintains rotational function of the remaining rotator cuff.

Stefan Greiner1, Christan Schmidt, Christian König, Carsten Perka, Sebastian Herrmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Humeral rotation often remains compromised after nonlateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Reduced rotational moment arms and muscle slackening have been identified as possible reasons for this impairment. Although several clinical studies suggest lateralized RSA may increase rotation, it is unclear whether this is attributable to preservation of rotational moment arms and muscle pretension of the remaining rotator cuff. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The lateralized RSA was analyzed to determine whether (1) the rotational moment arms and (2) the origin-to-insertion distances of the teres minor and subscapularis can be preserved, and (3) their flexion and abduction moment arms are decreased.
METHODS: Lateralized RSA using an 8-mm resin block under the glenosphere was performed on seven cadaveric shoulder specimens. Preimplantation and postimplantation CT scans were obtained to create three-dimensional shoulder surface models. Using these models, function-specific moment arms and origin-to-insertion distances of three segments of the subscapularis and teres minor muscles were calculated.
RESULTS: The rotational moment arms remained unchanged for the middle and caudal subscapularis and teres minor segments in all tested positions (subscapularis, -16.1 mm versus -15.8 mm; teres minor, 15.9 mm versus 15.3 mm). The origin-to-insertion distances increased or remained unchanged in any muscle segment apart from the distal subscapularis segment at 0° abduction (139 mm versus 145 mm). The subscapularis and teres minor had increased flexion moment arms in abduction angles smaller than 60° (subscapularis, 2.7 mm versus 8.3 mm; teres minor, -6.6 mm versus 0.8 mm). Abduction moment arms decreased for all segments (subscapularis, 4 mm versus -11 mm; teres minor, -3.6 mm versus -19 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: After lateralized RSA, the subscapularis and teres minor maintained their length and rotational moment arms, their flexion forces were increased, and abduction capability decreased. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings could explain clinically improved rotation in lateralized RSA in comparison to nonlateralized RSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23212769      PMCID: PMC3563780          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2692-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

Review 1.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan J Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Frederic Balg
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Comparison of two methods for computing abduction moment arms of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  R E Hughes; G Niebur; J Liu; K N An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis.

Authors:  Jason C Clark; Joseph Ritchie; Frederick S Song; Michael J Kissenberth; Stefan J Tolan; Nathan D Hart; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability.

Authors:  S Lippitt; F Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A finite element musculoskeletal model of the shoulder mechanism.

Authors:  F C van der Helm
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The Stanmore total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  A W Lettin; S A Copeland; J T Scales
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1982

7.  Total shoulder replacement with a constrained prosthesis.

Authors:  M Post; S S Haskell; M Jablon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The semiconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  M J Coughlin; J M Morris; W F West
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Early results of a reverse design prosthesis in the treatment of arthritis of the shoulder in elderly patients with a large rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Aziz Boulahia; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch; Richard V Baratta
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture.

Authors:  P M Grammont; E Baulot
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  12 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The moment arms of the muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint: a systematic review.

Authors:  Freya Hik; David C Ackland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  The role of the subscapularis tendon in a lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: repair versus nonrepair.

Authors:  Edoardo Franceschetti; Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis; Riccardo Ranieri; Alessio Palumbo; Michele Paciotti; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Current trends in reverse fracture arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Warnhoff; G Jensen; H Lill; A Ellwein
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-21

6.  Maximizing range of motion of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using design optimization techniques.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; George Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 7.  Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Minoo Patel; David Knox
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  A Critical Review on Prosthetic Features Available for Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Alexander Van Tongel; Lieven De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Subscapularis Repair Is Unnecessary After Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Troy A Roberson; Ellen Shanley; James T Griscom; Michael Granade; Quinn Hunt; Kyle J Adams; Amit M Momaya; Adam Kwapisz; Michael J Kissenberth; Keith T Lonergan; Stefan J Tolan; Richard J Hawkins; John M Tokish
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-07-12

10.  The effect of metaglene lateralization on joint mobility of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Stephanie Kahmann; Michael Hackl; Stephan Uschok; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.