Literature DB >> 21116754

Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is it important to avoid it and how?

Christophe Lévigne1, Jérome Garret, Pascal Boileau, Ghassan Alami, Luc Favard, Gilles Walch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scapular notching, erosion of the scapular neck related to impingement by the medial rim of the humeral cup during adduction, is a radiographic sign specific to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Its clinical and radiological consequences remain unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Therefore, we: (1) determined the incidence of notching in a large series, (2) described the natural history of notching, (3) determined whether notching is related to functional scores or (4) radiographic signs of failure, and (5) identified factors related to notch development. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 448 patients who underwent a Grammont-type RSA (461 shoulders) with a mean followup of 51 months (range, 24-206 months). RSA was implanted for cuff tear arthropathy or osteoarthritis with cuff deficiency. We assessed scapular notching using AP views standardized under fluoroscopy. Clinical assessment included Constant-Murley score and range of motion. Aside from notching, radiographic assessment included evaluation of humeral and glenoid radiolucent lines.
RESULTS: Notching occurred in 68% of cases. It appeared early, but its later evolution was variable. Notching was associated with followup, strength, passive and active elevation, humeral radiolucent lines, and glenoid lucent lines. It also correlated with a higher rate in patients with preoperative superior erosion.
CONCLUSIONS: Scapular notching is frequent, generally progresses, and is associated with deterioration of some clinical parameters and radiolucent lines. We believe the preoperative pattern of glenoid erosion is of particular importance due to its influence on the surgeon's glenoid preparation and base-plate positioning. It is crucial to avoid cranial position and superior tilt. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21116754      PMCID: PMC3148391          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1695-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Revision of shoulder replacement with a reversed shoulder prosthesis (Delta III): report of five cases.

Authors:  L De Wilde; M Mombert; P Van Petegem; R Verdonk
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 0.500

Review 2.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan J Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Frederic Balg
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Clément M L Werner; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Ryan W Simovitch; Matthias A Zumstein; Eveline Lohri; Naeder Helmy; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  M Rittmeister; F Kerschbaumer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan.

Authors:  D Goutallier; J M Postel; J Bernageau; L Lavau; M C Voisin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

9.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Pascal Boileau; Luc Favard; Pascal Garaud; Daniel Molé; François Sirveaux; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture.

Authors:  P M Grammont; E Baulot
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  53 in total

1.  The clinical and radiographical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric glenosphere.

Authors:  Naoko Mizuno; Patrick J Denard; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Tom Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Kevin Chan; G Daniel G Langohr; Matthew Mahaffy; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CORR Insights®: Superior Baseplate Inclination Is Associated With Instability After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Classifications in Brief: The Nerot-Sirveaux Classification for Scapular Notching.

Authors:  Bradley L Young; Colin K Cantrell; Nady Hamid
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Sebastian Mukka; Erling Englund; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  An in vivo kinematic study of the reverse shoulder joint replacement.

Authors:  Carl Chisholm; Peter C Poon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-13

Review 9.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.