Literature DB >> 24271331

Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Alexandre Lädermann1, Tom Bradley Edwards, Gilles Walch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to provide a better understanding of biomechanical changes induced by reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), discuss the different techniques of radiographic assessment of upper limb lengthening after RSA and determine the ideal soft tissue tension that provides the best functional outcome without increasing the risk of complications.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were articles in which the primary interest was the technique of measuring upper-extremity lengthening after complications related to lengthening and its role in postoperative function; those written in English, French or German; and those that provided evidence levels I-IV relevant to search terms.
RESULTS: Seven articles met our inclusion criteria. Postoperatively, changes in humeral length varied from minus five to five millimetres, and changes in upper-extremity length varied from 15 mm to 27 mm. The acromiohumeral distance averaged 23 mm. Humeral and arm shortening increased the risk of dislocation and led to poor anterior active elevation. The type of surgical approach did not play a role in postoperative function. Subclinical neurological lesions were frequent.
CONCLUSIONS: Studies in this systematic review indicate that deltoid tensioning by restoring humeral length and increasing the acromiohumeral distance is critical for adequate postoperative function and to prevent dislocation. Excessive arm lengthening should be avoided, with zero to two centimetres of lengthening being a reasonable goal to avoid postoperative neurological impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24271331      PMCID: PMC3997774          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2175-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  67 in total

1.  Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Istvan Hovorka
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 2.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan J Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Frederic Balg
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Clément M L Werner; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kamal I Bohsali; Michael A Wirth; Charles A Rockwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture.

Authors:  Jonathan Levy; Mark Frankle; Mark Mighell; Derek Pupello
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  C M L Werner; P A Steinmann; M Gilbart; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  [The DASH(Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand) Questionnaire--a new instrument for evaluating upper extremity treatment outcome].

Authors:  G Germann; G Wind; A Harth
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.018

Review 8.  Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Derek Plausinis; Young W Kwon; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2005

9.  Quantitative assessment of the muscles of the rotator cuff with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Zanetti; C Gerber; J Hodler
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  [Grammont reversed prosthesis for acute complex fracture of the proximal humerus in an elderly population with 5 to 12 years follow-up].

Authors:  J-F Cazeneuve; D-J Cristofari
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2006-10
View more
  28 in total

1.  Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Alexandre Terrier; Julien Ston; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Massive rotator cuff tears: definition and treatment.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Philippe Collin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty comparing X-rays and computerised tomography.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Matthew Daggett; Yannick Carrillon; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reproducibility of a new method for measuring lowering and medialisation of the humerus after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Axel Marcoin; Antoine Ferrier; Laurent Blasco; Paul De Boissieu; Cécile Nerot; Xavier Ohl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Treatment of cephalotuberosity fractures in elderly patients treated by reverse shoulder prosthesis: a study of functional results in relation to deltoid tension.

Authors:  Pierre-Sylvain Marcheix; Isaline Bazin; Guillaume Vergnenegre; Christian Mabit; Jean-Louis Charissoux
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Sebastian Mukka; Erling Englund; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ian P Mayne; Simon N Bell; Warwick Wright; Jennifer A Coghlan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-01-25

8.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Anatomical reconstruction to treat acromion fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Hess; Ralph Zettl; Daniel Smolen; Christoph Knoth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.