Literature DB >> 27526066

An in vivo kinematic study of the reverse shoulder joint replacement.

Carl Chisholm1, Peter C Poon2.   

Abstract

As of now few studies have investigated the kinematics of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients and none on how this may be affected by glenosphere shape or size. There have been a few biomechanical studies evaluating the RSA. These studies have modelled and estimated that a large amount of movement is available at the glenohumeral articulation, when using a standard glenosphere, with even more movement using an eccentric or large glenosphere. However, the in vivo kinematics of the RSA has not been determined. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the in vivo kinematics of the RSA and to observe what affect the glenosphere type would have. Areas of specific interest were the maximal abduction, the ratio of glenohumeral to scapulothoracic motion, and an observation of what occurs during notching. We obtained 18 patients who had high functioning reverse shoulder replacements, with surgery greater than a year ago. We assessed the kinematics, first with fluoroscopy, where we obtained 5 images at various levels of abduction. Then, at the same sitting, electromagnetic sensors were placed on the lateral epicondyle, acromion and base of the scapular spine. These sensors were attached to the Polhemus 3space tracking system that allowed us to measure the movement of the humerus and the movement of scapula during cycles of abduction. Our results demonstrated that the RSA is able to reproduce kinematics similar to the quoted physiological kinematics. Eccentric glenospheres had higher abduction and are less likely to experience superior impingement of the humerus on the under surface of the acromion or develop the more severe stages of notching. The range of movement in our study was highest in the 36-mm eccentric glenospheres and lowest in the 44-mm concentric glenospheres. Notching, although not associated with a poor outcome score or a lower range of movement was more prevalent in patients whose first phase of movement, consisted mainly of scapulothoracic motion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vivo kinematics; SMR reverse prosthesis

Year:  2011        PMID: 27526066     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-011-0901-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  6 in total

1.  Contribution of the reverse endoprosthesis to glenohumeral kinematics.

Authors:  Jeroen H M Bergmann; M de Leeuw; Thomas W J Janssen; DirkJan H E J Veeger; W J Willems
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: range of motion and risk of scapular notching.

Authors:  Justin Chou; Sharif F Malak; Iain A Anderson; Tim Astley; Peter C Poon
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  A biomechanical analysis of scapular rotation during arm abduction in the scapular plane.

Authors:  S D Bagg; W J Forrest
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is it important to avoid it and how?

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Jérome Garret; Pascal Boileau; Ghassan Alami; Luc Favard; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  The contribution of the scapula to active shoulder motion and self-assessed function in three hundred and fifty two patients prior to elective shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; David Andrew Hulet; Chris McDonald; Anastasia Whitson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti; Jean Kany; Kamil Elkholti; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Three-dimensional kinematics of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between shoulders with good or poor elevation.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Shota Hoshika; Yusuke Ueda; Morihito Tokai; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Scott A Banks
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.