Literature DB >> 12564670

Promoting repeat mammography use: insights from a systematic needs assessment.

Melissa R Partin1, Jonathan S Slater.   

Abstract

This article describes the process and outcome of a needs assessment conducted to guide the development of interventions to increase repeat mammography use among participants in a federally funded cancer screening program. Health behavior theory and data from a phone survey are used to uncover key barriers to repeat mammography use and to identify fruitful intervention approaches for modifying them. Estimates of (a) compliance with mammography guidelines, (b) readiness to adopt regular mammography use, (c) the most common reasons for not being rescreened, and (d) population attributable risks associated with various predictors of repeat mammography use are presented and, with guidance from the transtheoretical model of behavior change, used to make inferences about the type of intervention strategies most appropriate for promoting repeat mammography use in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12564670     DOI: 10.1177/1090198102239261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  7 in total

1.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  It's the amount of thought that counts: when ambivalence contributes to mammography screening delay.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer M Gierisch; Barbara K Rimer; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-11-03

3.  The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.

Authors:  Victoria Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Siu Hui; Patrick Monahan; Beth Juliar; Joanne Daggy; Usha Menon
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-12-28

4.  Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD.

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Adam Buchanan; Victoria Champion; Patrick Monahan; Susan Rawl; Jeffrey Springston; Zhao Qianqian; Sara Bourff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-26

5.  Evaluation of Entertainment Education Strategies to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening and Knowledge in Colombian Women.

Authors:  Roland Lincoln Boyden Lamb; Sara Milena Ramos Jaraba; Valentina Graciano Tangarife; Isabel C Garcés-Palacio
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Beliefs about optimal age and screening frequency predict breast screening adherence in a prospective study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Sarah A Edwards; Gord Glendon; Lucia Mirea; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.