Literature DB >> 12173678

Comparisons of tailored mammography interventions at two months postintervention.

Victoria L Champion1, Celette Sugg Skinner, Usha Menon, Roopa Seshadri, Deborah C Anzalone, Susan M Rawl.   

Abstract

The recent decrease in breast cancer mortality has been linked in part to increased breast cancer screening. Although the percentage of women screened once is rising, rate of continued adherence is poor. The purpose of this article is to assess the effects of tailored mammography interventions implemented prospectively in a factorial design contrasting groups receiving either (a) usual care (no intervention), (b) tailored telephone counseling for mammography, (c) tailored mailed materials promoting mammography, or (d) a combination of tailored mail and telephone counseling. This prospective, randomized study with a 2 x 2 factorial design included women 51 years and older (N = 1,367) who were not adherent with mammography at baseline. The intervention is based on integration of the Transtheoretical and Health Belief Models. Participants were enrolled in one of two health maintenance organizations or seen in a university-related primary care clinic. Baseline data were collected on mammography history and beliefs and knowledge related to mammography. Data were collected via telephone interviews using previously developed scales. The follow-up interviewers were conducted with 976 women. The sample was 41% White, 56% African American, and 3% other. Mean age at baseline was 66.5. Logistic regression indicates that postintervention mammography status in all three intervention groups was significantly better than usual care, with odds ratios ranging from 1.66 (telephone only) to 2.16 (telephone plus mail).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173678     DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  19 in total

Review 1.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.

Authors:  Victoria Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Siu Hui; Patrick Monahan; Beth Juliar; Joanne Daggy; Usha Menon
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-12-28

3.  Breast cancer screening practices among first-generation immigrant muslim women.

Authors:  Memoona Hasnain; Usha Menon; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Laura Szalacha
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Victoria Champion; Patrick O Monahan; Joanne Daggy; Siu Hui; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

5.  Physicians' approaches to recommending colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Leah Karliner; Nancy Burke; Carol P Somkin; Linda A Pham; Rena Pasick
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 7.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

8.  Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Perkins; Yan Tong; Connie Krier; Victoria L Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jeffrey K Springston; Thomas F Imperiale; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women.

Authors:  Christopher M Masi; Dionne J Blackman; Monica E Peek
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Assess the effects of culturally relevant intervention on breast cancer knowledge, beliefs, and mammography use among Korean American women.

Authors:  Jin Hee Kim; Usha Menon; Edward Wang; Laura Szalacha
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2009-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.