Literature DB >> 21094768

Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins.

A I Vazquez1, G J M Rosa, K A Weigel, G de los Campos, D Gianola, D B Allison.   

Abstract

Genome-enabled prediction of breeding values using high-density panels (HDP) can be highly accurate, even for young sires. However, the cost of the assay may limit its use to elite animals only. Low-density panels (LDP) containing a subset of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) may give reasonably accurate predictions and could be used cost-effectively with young males and females. This study evaluates strategies for selecting subsets of SNP for several traits, compares predictive ability of LDP with that of HDP, and assesses the benefits of including parent average (PA) as a predictor in models using LDP. Data consisting of progeny-test predicted transmitting ability (PTA) for net merit and 6 other traits of economic interest from 4,783 Holstein sires were evaluated using testing and training sets with regressions on their high-density genotypes and parent averages for net merit index. Additionally, SNP subsets of different sizes were selected using different strategies, including the "best" SNP based on the absolute values of their estimated effects from HDP models for either the trait itself or lifetime net merit, and evenly spaced (ES) SNP across the genome. Overall, HDP models had the best predictive ability, setting an upper bound for the predictive ability of LDP sets. Low-density panels targeting the SNP with strongest effects (for either a single trait or lifetime net merit) provided reasonably accurate predictions and generally outperformed predictions based on evenly spaced SNP. For example, evenly spaced sets would require at least 5,000 to 7,500 SNP to reach 95% of the predictive ability provided by HDP. On the other hand, this level of predictive ability can be achieved with sets of 2,000 SNP when SNP are selected based on magnitude of estimated effects for the trait. Accuracy of predictions based on LDP can be improved markedly by including parent average as a fixed effect in the model; for example, a set with the 1,000 best SNP using the parent average achieved the 95% of the accuracy of a HDP model.
Copyright © 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094768      PMCID: PMC3207239          DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; C P Van Tassell; G R Wiggans; T S Sonstegard; R D Schnabel; J F Taylor; F S Schenkel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic selection using low-density marker panels.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  K A Weigel; G de los Campos; O González-Recio; H Naya; X L Wu; N Long; G J M Rosa; D Gianola
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits.

Authors:  R Lande; R Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle.

Authors:  K A Weigel; G de Los Campos; A I Vazquez; G J M Rosa; D Gianola; C P Van Tassell
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.034

  7 in total
  31 in total

Review 1.  Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Daniel Gianola; David B Allison
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Application of support vector regression to genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Nanye Long; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Accurate genomic prediction of Coffea canephora in multiple environments using whole-genome statistical models.

Authors:  Luís Felipe Ventorim Ferrão; Romário Gava Ferrão; Maria Amélia Gava Ferrão; Aymbiré Fonseca; Peter Carbonetto; Matthew Stephens; Antonio Augusto Franco Garcia
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Priors in whole-genome regression: the bayesian alphabet returns.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A comprehensive genetic approach for improving prediction of skin cancer risk in humans.

Authors:  Ana I Vazquez; Gustavo de los Campos; Yann C Klimentidis; Guilherme J M Rosa; Daniel Gianola; Nengjun Yi; David B Allison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Beyond missing heritability: prediction of complex traits.

Authors:  Robert Makowsky; Nicholas M Pajewski; Yann C Klimentidis; Ana I Vazquez; Christine W Duarte; David B Allison; Gustavo de los Campos
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Prediction of expected years of life using whole-genome markers.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Yann C Klimentidis; Ana I Vazquez; David B Allison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Gerhard Moser; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Accuracy of across-environment genome-wide prediction in maize nested association mapping populations.

Authors:  Zhigang Guo; Dominic M Tucker; Daolong Wang; Christopher J Basten; Elhan Ersoz; William H Briggs; Jianwei Lu; Min Li; Gilles Gay
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.