Literature DB >> 19299339

Genomic selection using low-density marker panels.

D Habier1, R L Fernando, J C M Dekkers.   

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) using high-density single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is promising to improve response to selection in populations that are under artificial selection. High-density SNP genotyping of all selection candidates each generation, however, may not be cost effective. Smaller panels with SNPs that show strong associations with phenotype can be used, but this may require separate SNPs for each trait and each population. As an alternative, we propose to use a panel of evenly spaced low-density SNPs across the genome to estimate genome-assisted breeding values of selection candidates in pedigreed populations. The principle of this approach is to utilize cosegregation information from low-density SNPs to track effects of high-density SNP alleles within families. Simulations were used to analyze the loss of accuracy of estimated breeding values from using evenly spaced and selected SNP panels compared to using all high-density SNPs in a Bayesian analysis. Forward stepwise selection and a Bayesian approach were used to select SNPs. Loss of accuracy was nearly independent of the number of simulated quantitative trait loci (QTL) with evenly spaced SNPs, but increased with number of QTL for the selected SNP panels. Loss of accuracy with evenly spaced SNPs increased steadily over generations but was constant when the smaller number individuals that are selected for breeding each generation were also genotyped using the high-density SNP panel. With equal numbers of low-density SNPs, panels with SNPs selected on the basis of the Bayesian approach had the smallest loss in accuracy for a single trait, but a panel with evenly spaced SNPs at 10 cM was only slightly worse, whereas a panel with SNPs selected by forward stepwise selection was inferior. Panels with evenly spaced SNPs can, however, be used across traits and populations and their performance is independent of the number of QTL affecting the trait and of the methods used to estimate effects in the training data and are, therefore, preferred for broad applications in pedigreed populations under artificial selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19299339      PMCID: PMC2674831          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.100289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  26 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Prediction of identity by descent probabilities from marker-haplotypes.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation.

Authors:  Benjamin D Horne; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  In silico method for inferring genotypes in pedigrees.

Authors:  Joshua T Burdick; Wei-Min Chen; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Vivian G Cheung
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models.

Authors:  S C Heath
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Linkage disequilibrium at steady state determined by random genetic drift and recurrent mutation.

Authors:  T Ohta; M Kimura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Novel multilocus measure of linkage disequilibrium to estimate past effective population size.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Peter M Visscher; Helen C McPartlan; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  101 in total

1.  Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins.

Authors:  A I Vazquez; G J M Rosa; K A Weigel; G de los Campos; D Gianola; D B Allison
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits with epistatic effects in plant breeding populations.

Authors:  D Wang; I Salah El-Basyoni; P Stephen Baenziger; J Crossa; K M Eskridge; I Dweikat
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Bayesian inference of genetic parameters based on conditional decompositions of multivariate normal distributions.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann; Chunkao Wang; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A hidden markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping.

Authors:  Tom Druet; Michel Georges
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Modeling of identity-by-descent processes along a chromosome between haplotypes and their genotyped ancestors.

Authors:  Tom Druet; Frederic Paul Farnir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.

Authors:  David Habier; Jens Tetens; Franz-Reinhold Seefried; Peter Lichtner; Georg Thaller
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Genomic breeding value prediction using three Bayesian methods and application to reduced density marker panels.

Authors:  Matthew A Cleveland; Selma Forni; Nader Deeb; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2010-03-31

8.  A gene frequency model for QTL mapping using Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Wei He; Rohan L Fernando; Jack Cm Dekkers; Helene Gilbert
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.

Authors:  Gerhard Moser; Bruce Tier; Ron E Crump; Mehar S Khatkar; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.