Literature DB >> 21086020

Optimal conditions for multifocal VEP recording for normal Japanese population established by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Kumiko Ishikawa1, Takayuki Nagai, Yuko Yamada, Akira Negi, Makoto Nakamura.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish optimal conditions for recording multifocal visual evoked potentials (mVEPs) in Japanese individuals, whose skull frame presumably differs from Caucasians. The scalp point that was extended from the calcarine fissure was identified using magnetic resonance imaging scans of 200 subjects. MVEPs were recorded from 56 individuals using three single channels and combinations of vertical and horizontal channels. Five electrodes were placed at the inion, 4 cm above the inion, 2.5 cm below the inion, 4 cm to the left or 4 cm to the right of the inion. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was obtained by measuring the root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude of a signal window (45-150 ms) from each of 60-local responses that was divided by the average of the 60 RMS amplitudes of the noise window (325-430 ms). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed based on the proportion of mVEP responses that exceeded a specific SNR criterion, calculated for both the signal window and the noise window. The position of the calcarine fissure relative to the inion was significantly lower than the value reported for Caucasians. The ROC analyses disclosed that bi-channel combinations (one vertical and one horizontal) had significantly better performance to discriminate signal from noise in 60-local mVEP responses compared to any single channel and performed similarly to the tri-channel combination. Two sets of perpendicular channels should be simultaneously used in recording mVEP responses from Japanese people, among whom skull frame characteristics differ from those observed in Caucasians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21086020     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9252-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  25 in total

1.  Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes.

Authors:  D C Hood; X Zhang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Objective perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Candice S Chen; Jenny E Hong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Optimizing electrode positions and analysis strategies for multifocal VEP recordings by ROC analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Meigen; Mathias Krämer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Pattern reversal evoked potentials: gender differences and age-related changes in amplitude and latency.

Authors:  R Emmerson-Hanover; D E Shearer; D J Creel; R E Dustman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03

7.  Objective response detection in the frequency domain.

Authors:  R A Dobie; M J Wilson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec

8.  Visual evoked potentials in the older population: age and gender effects.

Authors:  K W Mitchell; J W Howe; S R Spencer
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1987-11

9.  Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work?

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Bryan J Winn
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  4 in total

1.  Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of multifocal VEPs to diagnose and quantify glaucomatous functional damage.

Authors:  Makoto Nakamura; Kumiko Ishikawa; Takayuki Nagai; Akira Negi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Reproducibility in the global indices for multifocal visual evoked potentials and Humphrey visual fields in controls and glaucomatous eyes within a 2-year period.

Authors:  Yukako Inoue; Kei Kato; Seiko Kamata; Kumiko Ishikawa; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Effect of refractive errors on multifocal VEP responses and standard automated perimetry tests in a single population.

Authors:  Makoto Nakamura; Kei Kato; Seiko Kamata; Kumiko Ishikawa; Takayuki Nagai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation.

Authors:  G S Souza; H B Schakelford; A L A Moura; B D Gomes; D F Ventura; M E C Fitzgerald; L C L Silveira
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.590

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.