Literature DB >> 24615593

Effect of refractive errors on multifocal VEP responses and standard automated perimetry tests in a single population.

Makoto Nakamura1, Kei Kato, Seiko Kamata, Kumiko Ishikawa, Takayuki Nagai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that the degree of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) distribution overlaps between a signal window and a noise window in multifocal VEP (mfVEP) responses, which is determined by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve termed SNR-AUC, can quantitatively detect glaucomatous visual functional damage. However, the effect of high myopia on this parameter is not yet known.
METHODS: SNR-AUC, total deviation, and retinal sensitivity on the Humphrey visual field (HVF) test were compared among 34 eyes>-6 diopters (control) and 21 eyes≤-6 diopters (high myopia), both of which were ophthalmoscopically normal and had a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20. The mfVEP and HVF parameters were obtained from stimulus areas that corresponded to both HVF 24-2 and 10-2 programs.
RESULTS: Both the HVF 24-2 total deviation and the SNR-AUC obtained from 60 sectors in high-myopia patients were significantly lower compared with controls (P=0.045 and P=0.003, respectively). The SNR-AUC obtained from the central 36 sectors that corresponded to the HVF 10-2 area in high-myopia patients was also significantly lower than that of the controls (P=0.01). Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that age and refractive error were significantly associated with retinal sensitivity on the HVF 24-2 and SNR-AUC for the whole field and central field, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: High myopia reduces the SNR-AUC of mfVEP responses, even with refractive correction. A normative database should be separately established for high myopes to evaluate the mfVEP responses obtained from highly myopic glaucoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615593     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-014-9431-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  29 in total

Review 1.  Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Objective perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma: Heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  C Balachandran; S L Graham; A Klistorner; I Goldberg
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Optimizing electrode positions and analysis strategies for multifocal VEP recordings by ROC analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Meigen; Mathias Krämer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of multifocal VEPs to diagnose and quantify glaucomatous functional damage.

Authors:  Makoto Nakamura; Kumiko Ishikawa; Takayuki Nagai; Akira Negi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds.

Authors:  R N Weinreb; J P Perlman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Visual evoked potential (VEP): basic concepts and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Sherman
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1979-01

8.  Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Emily Patterson; Annisa Jamil; Steven L Mansberger; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery.

Authors:  W Drexler; O Findl; R Menapace; G Rainer; C Vass; C K Hitzenberger; A F Fercher
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reproducibility in the global indices for multifocal visual evoked potentials and Humphrey visual fields in controls and glaucomatous eyes within a 2-year period.

Authors:  Yukako Inoue; Kei Kato; Seiko Kamata; Kumiko Ishikawa; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.