Literature DB >> 7694837

Objective response detection in the frequency domain.

R A Dobie1, M J Wilson.   

Abstract

Several different and related measures have been proposed for objective response detection in the frequency domain. We compared magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) to phase coherence (PC) using simulations with specified signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and varying numbers of subaverages; the performance measure was area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. MSC was superior to PC; test time required for equivalent performance is about 3 times greater for PC than for MSC. MSC performance for a given final SNR increased with the number of subaverages, but reached a plateau at 16 subaverages. Simulations of noise non-stationarity (high-amplitude noise in some subaverages compared to the others) led to decreased performance advantage for MSC over PC. However, weighted averaging restored this advantage. MSC is shown to be a simple algebraic transform of Victor and Mast's (1991) "circular T2" statistic and of two earlier statistics; all have identical statistical power.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7694837     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90040-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  10 in total

1.  Optimal conditions for multifocal VEP recording for normal Japanese population established by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Kumiko Ishikawa; Takayuki Nagai; Yuko Yamada; Akira Negi; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Some thoughts on the interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Relating the steady-state visual evoked potential to single-stimulus responses derived from m-sequence stimulation.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Maresa Groten; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Improving the power of objective response detection of evoked responses in noise by using average and product of magnitude-squared coherence of two different signals.

Authors:  Tiago Zanotelli; Antonio Mauricio Ferreira Leite Miranda de Sá; Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marçal Mendes; Leonardo Bonato Felix
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Temporal frequency dependence of the polarity inversion between upper and lower visual field in the pattern-onset steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Roman Kessler; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Fluctuation of gamma-band phase synchronization within the auditory cortex in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Keeran Maharajh; Peter Teale; Donald C Rojas; Martin L Reite
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Test-retest reliability of the 40 Hz EEG auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Kristina L McFadden; Sarah E Steinmetz; Adam M Carroll; Steven T Simon; Alissa Wallace; Donald C Rojas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.