Literature DB >> 14620963

Cultural sensitivity and informed decision making about prostate cancer screening.

Evelyn C Y Chan1, Michelle C Haynes, Frederick T O'Donnell, Carolyn Bachino, Sally W Vernon.   

Abstract

Because informed consent for prostate cancer screening with prostate specific antigen (PSA) is recommended, we determined how African Americans, Hispanics, and Caucasians want information about screening with PSA and the digital rectal exam (DRE) presented in culturally sensitive brochures specific for each group. We analyzed focus group discussions using content analysis and compared themes across groups in a university outpatient internal medicine practice setting. The participants were twenty couples with men age 50 and older who participated in four focus groups. Main outcome measures were participants' views on the content and graphic design of culturally sensitive brochures promoting informed decision making about prostate cancer screening. There were content and graphic design differences in the way ethnic groups wanted information presented about the prostate, prostate cancer, risk, and screening. Caucasians likened the size of the prostate to a walnut; Hispanics, to a small lime. Hispanics emphasized how advanced prostate cancer can be symptomatic; Caucasians, how early prostate cancer can be asymptomatic. African Americans wanted risk information specific for them and the advantages and disadvantages of a PSA and DRE; Hispanics, did not. Caucasians and African Americans sought a more active role for men in informed decision making than Hispanics. Differences in the way African Americans, Hispanics, and Caucasians want information presented about prostate cancer screening suggest there may be cultural differences in the reasonable person standard of informed consent, in attitudes toward the physician-patient relationship, screening, and informed decision making. Physicians promoting informed decision making about controversial screening tests should take cultural sensitivity into account when designing educational interventions and using them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620963     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026072022853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  59 in total

Review 1.  Integrating cultural diversity in patient education.

Authors:  G A Bechtel; R E Davidhizar
Journal:  Semin Nurse Manag       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified.

Authors:  K Resnicow; T Baranowski; J S Ahluwalia; R L Braithwaite
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Using prostate-specific antigen to diagnose prostate cancer: sailing in uncharted waters.

Authors:  P C Walsh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Screening for prostate cancer. American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Assessing cultural sensitivity in printed cancer materials.

Authors:  J J Guidry; V D Walker
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

6.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA).

Authors: 
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Cancer statistics, 1999.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: are patients making informed decisions?

Authors:  K J O'Dell; R J Volk; A R Cass; S J Spann
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC): an update. Members of the ERSPC, Section Rotterdam.

Authors:  F H Schröder; R Kranse; J Rietbergen; R Hoedemaeke; W Kirkels
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Cancer prevention and early detection in ethnically diverse populations.

Authors:  S J Olsen; M Frank-Stromborg
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.315

View more
  12 in total

1.  Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach.

Authors:  Barak Gaster; Kelly Edwards; Susan Brown Trinidad; Thomas H Gallagher; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Perceptions of informed decision making about cancer screening in a diverse primary care population.

Authors:  Margaret L Gourlay; Carmen L Lewis; John S Preisser; C Madeline Mitchell; Philip D Sloane
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Beyond reading level: a systematic review of the suitability of cancer education print and Web-based materials.

Authors:  Ramona K C Finnie; Tisha M Felder; Suzanne Kneuper Linder; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The impact of family history of breast cancer on knowledge, attitudes, and early detection practices of Mexican women along the Mexico-US border.

Authors:  Yelena Bird; Matthew P Banegas; John Moraros; Sasha King; Surasri Prapasiri; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-10

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in predictors of PSA screening in a tri-ethnic population.

Authors:  G M Monawar Hosain; Maureen Sanderson; Xianglin L Du; Wenyaw Chan; Sara S Strom
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.163

6.  PEARL: A Guide for Developing Community-Engaging and Culturally-Sensitive Education Materials.

Authors:  David Haynes; Kelly D Hughes; Annette Okafor
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2022-10-20

7.  Conducting implementation research in community-based primary care: a qualitative study on integrating patient decision support interventions for cancer screening into routine practice.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Kirsty J Singer; Stefan Timmermans
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Sociodemographic differences in fears and mistrust contributing to unwillingness to participate in cancer screenings.

Authors:  Jenna L Davis; Shalanda A Bynum; Ralph V Katz; Kyrel Buchanan; B Lee Green
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-11

9.  Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; France Légaré; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-09-03

10.  Prostate cancer screening in Primary Health Care: the current state of affairs.

Authors:  Weranja Kb Ranasinghe; Simon P Kim; Nathan P Papa; Shomik Sengupta; Mark Frydenberg; Damien Bolton; Dimity Pond; Karin Ried; Melanie J Marshall; Raj Persad; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.