Literature DB >> 12795733

Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing.

Evelyn C Y Chan1, Sally W Vernon, Michelle C Haynes, Frederick T O'Donnell, Chul Ahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine physicians' rating of the importance of key facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and whether there are differences by specialty. PARTICIPANTS: A nationwide random sample of internists, family physicians, and urologists stratified by physician specialty from The Official ABMS Directory of Board-Certified Medical Specialists 2000 Edition. MEASUREMENTS: Internists (N = 139), family physicians (N = 160), and urologists (N = 151) were asked to rate how important it is for men to know 17 facts about PSA screening using a 5-point Likert scale. MAIN
RESULTS: Of 769 eligible physicians, 450 responded, for an overall response rate of 59%. Urologists and nonurologists differed in rating how important it was for men to know 9 of the 17 key facts. Eight of the nine statements that urologists and nonurologists disagreed upon concerned facts reflecting uncertainty. Nonurologists were more likely than urologists to rate facts reflecting uncertainty as highly important for men to know. These included statements about prostate cancer risk, screening with PSA, and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite professional guidelines supporting informed decision making, the importance of facts men ought to know about PSA testing differ by physician specialty. Systematic differences may reflect differences in professional guidelines about PSA testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12795733      PMCID: PMC1494865          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20626.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  30 in total

1.  (Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  Med Humanit Rev       Date:  1987-01

2.  The National Cancer Institute Multi-Screening Trial.

Authors:  P Prorok
Journal:  Can J Oncol       Date:  1994-11

3.  The European Screening Study for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  F H Schröder
Journal:  Can J Oncol       Date:  1994-11

4.  Screening by the prostate-specific antigen test: what do the patients know?

Authors:  P N Diefenbach; P A Ganz; A J Pawlow; D Guthrie
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. An examination of the evidence.

Authors:  S H Woolf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prostate cancer screening. What family physicians believe is best.

Authors:  R J Hicks; R M Hamm; D A Bemben
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1995-04

7.  Knowledge, beliefs, and prior screening behavior among blacks and whites reporting for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  W Demark-Wahnefried; T Strigo; K Catoe; M Conaway; M Brunetti; B K Rimer; C N Robertson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Public awareness of prostate cancer and the prostate-specific antigen test.

Authors:  A G Mainous; M D Hagen
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1994 May-Jun

9.  Screening for prostate cancer: a comparison of urologists and primary care physicians.

Authors:  J T McKnight; P H Tietze; B B Adcock; A J Maxwell; W O Smith; M C Nagy
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 10.  Informed consent in theory and practice: legal and medical perspectives on the informed consent doctrine and a proposed reconceptualization.

Authors:  C L Sprung; B J Winick
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  11 in total

1.  Brief report: physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen. A national survey.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michael J Barry; Sally W Vernon; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prostate and colon cancer screening messages in popular magazines.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Stacey Sheridan; Michael Pignone; Carmen Lewis; Jamila Battle; Claudia Gollop; Michael O'Malley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach.

Authors:  Barak Gaster; Kelly Edwards; Susan Brown Trinidad; Thomas H Gallagher; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Physician-patient discussions about prostate-specific antigen test use among African-American men.

Authors:  Bernice B Tannor; Louie Ross
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Virtual physicians, health systems, and the healing relationship.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patient-provider communication in cancer screening.

Authors:  Tung T Nguyen; Stephen J McPhee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Evelyn C Y Chan; Lynnea K Ladouceur; Jeffrey M Stein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-17

8.  Patient-Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment: New Evidence From the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Soumitra S Bhuyan; Aastha Chandak; Niodita Gupta; Sudhir Isharwal; Chad LaGrange; Asos Mahmood; Dan Gentry
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-07

9.  Screening in the dark: ethical considerations of providing screening tests to individuals when evidence is insufficient to support screening populations.

Authors:  Ingrid M Burger; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.229

10.  Family physicians' perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes regarding information sharing with prostate cancer patients throughout the course of the disease.

Authors:  Orit Cohen Castel; Lea Ungar; Mordechai Alperin; Gilad E Amiel; Khaled Karkabi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.