Literature DB >> 21060026

Changes in invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ rates in relation to the decline in hormone therapy use.

Ghada N Farhat1, Rod Walker, Diana S M Buist, Tracy Onega, Karla Kerlikowske.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess trends in invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) incidence in association with changes in hormone therapy (HT) use in regular mammography screeners.
METHODS: We included 2,071,814 screening mammography examinations performed between January 1997 and December 2006 on 696,385 women age 40 to 79 years; 9,586 breast cancers were diagnosed within 12 months of a screening examination. We calculated adjusted annual rates (mammogram level) for prevalent HT use, incident invasive breast cancer (overall and by tumor histology and estrogen receptor [ER] status), and incident DCIS.
RESULTS: After a precipitous decrease in HT use in 2002, the incidence of invasive breast cancer decreased significantly in 2002 to 2006 among women age 50 to 69 years (P(trend(2002-2006)) = .005) and 70 to 79 years (P(trend(2002-2006)) = .003) but not in women age 40 to 49 years (P(trend(2002-2006)) = .45). DCIS rates significantly decreased in women age 50 to 69 years after 2002 (P(trend(2002-2006)) = .02). Invasive ductal tumors significantly declined in women age 50 to 69 years and 70 to 79 years in 2002 to 2006. In women age 50 to 69 years, invasive lobular and ER-positive cancer rates declined steadily in 2002 to 2005 (P(trend(2002-2005)) = .02 and .03, respectively), but an elevated rate in 2006 rendered the overall trend nonsignificant (P(trend(2002-2006)) = .89 and .91, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In parallel to the sharp decline in HT use in women undergoing regular mammography screening, invasive breast cancer rates decreased in women age 50 to 69 and 70 to 79 years after 2002, and DCIS rates decreased in women age 50 to 69 years, consistent with evidence that HT cessation reduces breast cancer risk. However, the decrease in incidence may have started to level off in 2006; this finding has not been uniformly reported in other populations, warranting further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21060026      PMCID: PMC3020688          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.5121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States.

Authors:  Bonnie C Yankaskas; Stephen H Taplin; Laura Ichikawa; Berta M Geller; Robert D Rosenberg; Patricia A Carney; Karla Kerlikowske; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Gary R Cutter; William E Barlow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Authors:  Therese B Bevers; Benjamin O Anderson; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Saundra Buys; Sandra Buys; Mary B Daly; Peter J Dempsey; William B Farrar; Irving Fleming; Judy E Garber; Randall E Harris; Alexandra S Heerdt; Mark Helvie; John G Huff; Nazanin Khakpour; Seema A Khan; Helen Krontiras; Gary Lyman; Elizabeth Rafferty; Sara Shaw; Mary Lou Smith; Theodore N Tsangaris; Cheryl Williams; Thomas Yankeelov; Thomas Yaneeklov
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  A 2009 update on the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Susan J Cleator; Eliyaz Ahamed; R Charles Coombes; Carlo Palmieri
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Analysis of covariance and standardization as instances of prediction.

Authors:  P W Lane; J A Nelder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Hormone therapy prescribing patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Katherine M Newton; Diana L Miglioretti; Kevin Beverly; Maureen T Connelly; Susan Andrade; Cynthia L Hartsfield; Feifei Wei; K Arnold Chan; Larry Kessler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia have declined with less use of postmenopausal hormone treatment: findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Tehillah S Menes; Karla Kerlikowske; Shabnam Jaffer; Deborah Seger; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  National use of postmenopausal hormone therapy: annual trends and response to recent evidence.

Authors:  Adam L Hersh; Marcia L Stefanick; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Susan L Hendrix; Robert D Langer; Marcia L Stefanick; Margery Gass; Dorothy Lane; Rebecca J Rodabough; Mary Ann Gilligan; Michele G Cyr; Cynthia A Thomson; Janardan Khandekar; Helen Petrovitch; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prognostic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal hormone users in a screened population.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Donald L Weaver; Diana S M Buist; William E Barlow; Gary Cutter; Berta M Geller; Bonnie Yankaskas; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  11 in total

1.  Screening mammography use among current, former, and never hormone therapy users may not explain recent declines in breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Rod Walker; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Walter Clinton; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Invasive Lobular Cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil Pramod; Akanksha Nigam; Mustafa Basree; Resham Mawalkar; Saba Mehra; Neelam Shinde; Gary Tozbikian; Nicole Williams; Sarmila Majumder; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-16

4.  Was the drop in mammography rates in 2005 associated with the drop in hormone therapy use?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Jasmin A Tiro; Helen I Meissner; Timothy S McNeel; Susan A Sabatino; Florence K Tangka; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Progesterone signalling in breast cancer: a neglected hormone coming into the limelight.

Authors:  Cathrin Brisken
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Occult breast tumor reservoir: biological properties and clinical significance.

Authors:  Richard J Santen; Wei Yue; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  Modeling of the growth kinetics of occult breast tumors: role in interpretation of studies of prevention and menopausal hormone therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Santen; Wei Yue; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.

Authors:  Joost Nederend; Lucien Em Duijm; Adri C Voogd; Johanna H Groenewoud; Frits H Jansen; Marieke Wj Louwman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Luminal breast cancer metastases and tumor arousal from dormancy are promoted by direct actions of estradiol and progesterone on the malignant cells.

Authors:  Ndiya Ogba; Nicole G Manning; Brian S Bliesner; S Kelly Ambler; James M Haughian; Mauricio P Pinto; Paul Jedlicka; Kristiina Joensuu; Päivi Heikkilä; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  The breast cancer epidemic: 10 facts.

Authors:  A Patrick Schneider; Christine M Zainer; Christopher Kevin Kubat; Nancy K Mullen; Amberly K Windisch
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.