Literature DB >> 19900937

Rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia have declined with less use of postmenopausal hormone treatment: findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Tehillah S Menes1, Karla Kerlikowske, Shabnam Jaffer, Deborah Seger, Diana L Miglioretti.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine risk factors and rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) with and without associated breast cancer over time and tumor characteristics of breast cancer with and without associated ADH in women previously screened with mammography.
METHODS: Data on screening mammograms done between 1996 and 2005 were collected from mammography registries that participate in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Associations between age, family history of breast cancer, postmenopausal hormone treatment (HT), and final pathology result (ADH or cancer with or without ADH in the same breast) were examined. Rates of different outcomes were calculated per exam year. Tumor characteristics of cancers with and without associated ADH were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 2,453,483 screening mammograms were associated with 1,064 biopsies with ADH, 833 breast cancers with ADH, and 8,161 cancers with no ADH. Postmenopausal HT use decreased significantly from 35% to 11% during the study period. Rates of ADH decreased from a peak of 5.5/10,000 mammograms in 1999 to 2.4/10,000 in 2005. Rates of cancer with ADH decreased from a peak of 4.3/10,000 mammograms in 2003 to 3.3/10,000 in 2005. ADH and breast cancer were significantly associated with use of postmenopausal HT. Cancer associated with ADH was of lower grade and stage and more estrogen receptor positive than cancer with no ADH.
SUMMARY: Postmenopausal HT is associated with an increased risk of ADH with or without cancer. Rates of ADH have decreased over the past decade, which may be partially explained by the significant reduction in use of postmenopausal HT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19900937      PMCID: PMC2920735          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  26 in total

1.  Risk factors for benign proliferative breast disease.

Authors:  C Friedenreich; H Bryant; F Alexander; J Hugh; J Danyluk; D Page
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Decline in breast cancer incidence after decrease in utilisation of hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Katalinic; Rajesh Rawal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge.

Authors:  Peter R Eby; Jennifer E Ochsner; Wendy B DeMartini; Kimberly H Allison; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Andrew G Glass; James V Lacey; J Daniel Carreon; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Family history of breast cancer, age and benign breast disease.

Authors:  Penelope M Webb; Celia Byrne; Stuart J Schnitt; James L Connolly; Timothy Jacobs; Gloria Peiro; Walter Willett; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Estrogen plus progestin and risk of benign proliferative breast disease.

Authors:  Thomas E Rohan; Abdissa Negassa; Rowan T Chlebowski; Norman L Lasser; Anne McTiernan; Robert S Schenken; Mindy Ginsberg; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; David L Page
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Conjugated equine estrogen and risk of benign proliferative breast disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas E Rohan; Abdissa Negassa; Rowan T Chlebowski; Laurel Habel; Anne McTiernan; Mindy Ginsberg; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; David L Page
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Epithelial atypia in biopsies performed for microcalcifications. practical considerations about 2,833 serially sectioned surgical biopsies with a long follow-up.

Authors:  Isabelle de Mascarel; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Isabelle Soubeyran; Véronique Picot; Jean-Michel Coindre; Louis Mauriac
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Decline in breast cancer incidence due to removal of promoter: combination estrogen plus progestin.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among U.S. women.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Use of clinical history affects accuracy of interpretive performance of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Andrea J Cook; Diana L Miglioretti; Stephen A Feig; Erin Aiello Bowles; Berta M Geller; Karla Kerlikowske; Mark Kettler; Tracy Onega; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The TU-025 keishibukuryogan clinical trial for hot flash management in postmenopausal women: results and lessons for future research.

Authors:  Gregory A Plotnikoff; Kenji Watanabe; Carolyn Torkelson; June La Valleur; David M Radosevich
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Upgrade of high-risk breast lesions detected on mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Tehillah S Menes; Robert Rosenberg; Steven Balch; Shabnam Jaffer; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Prospective Analysis Using a Novel CNN Algorithm to Distinguish Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Breast.

Authors:  Simukayi Mutasa; Peter Chang; John Nemer; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Mary Sun; Alison McIlvride; Maham Siddique; Richard Ha
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Changes in invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ rates in relation to the decline in hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Ghada N Farhat; Rod Walker; Diana S M Buist; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Accuracy of Distinguishing Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Convolutional Neural Network-Based Machine Learning Approach Using Mammographic Image Data.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Jenika Karcich; Christine Chin; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia: update on diagnosis, management, and molecular landscape.

Authors:  Tanjina Kader; Prue Hill; Emad A Rakha; Ian G Campbell; Kylie L Gorringe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 6.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.