Literature DB >> 12824205

Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial.

Rowan T Chlebowski1, Susan L Hendrix, Robert D Langer, Marcia L Stefanick, Margery Gass, Dorothy Lane, Rebecca J Rodabough, Mary Ann Gilligan, Michele G Cyr, Cynthia A Thomson, Janardan Khandekar, Helen Petrovitch, Anne McTiernan.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Women's Health Initiative trial of combined estrogen plus progestin was stopped early when overall health risks, including invasive breast cancer, exceeded benefits. Outstanding issues not previously addressed include characteristics of breast cancers observed among women using hormones and whether diagnosis may be influenced by hormone effects on mammography.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship among estrogen plus progestin use, breast cancer characteristics, and mammography recommendations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Following a comprehensive breast cancer risk assessment, 16 608 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years with an intact uterus were randomly assigned to receive combined conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg/d) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d) or placebo from 1993 to 1998 at 40 clinical centers. Screening mammography and clinical breast examinations were performed at baseline and yearly thereafter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breast cancer number and characteristics, and frequency of abnormal mammograms by estrogen plus progestin exposure.
RESULTS: In intent-to-treat analyses, estrogen plus progestin increased total (245 vs 185 cases; hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; weighted P<.001) and invasive (199 vs 150 cases; HR, 1.24; weighted P =.003) breast cancers compared with placebo. The invasive breast cancers diagnosed in the estrogen plus progestin group were similar in histology and grade but were larger (mean [SD], 1.7 cm [1.1] vs 1.5 cm [0.9], respectively; P =.04) and were at more advanced stage (regional/metastatic 25.4% vs 16.0%, respectively; P =.04) compared with those diagnosed in the placebo group. After 1 year, the percentage of women with abnormal mammograms was substantially greater in the estrogen plus progestin group (716 [9.4%] of 7656) compared with placebo group (398 [5.4%] of 7310; P<.001), a pattern which continued for the study duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Relatively short-term combined estrogen plus progestin use increases incident breast cancers, which are diagnosed at a more advanced stage compared with placebo use, and also substantially increases the percentage of women with abnormal mammograms. These results suggest estrogen plus progestin may stimulate breast cancer growth and hinder breast cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12824205     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.24.3243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  380 in total

1.  Modeling hot flushes and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  K L Rand; J L Otte; D Flockhart; D Hayes; A M Storniolo; V Stearns; N L Henry; A Nguyen; S Lemler; J Hayden; S Jeter; J S Carpenter
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  ck2-dependent phosphorylation of progesterone receptors (PR) on Ser81 regulates PR-B isoform-specific target gene expression in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Christy R Hagan; Tarah M Regan; Gwen E Dressing; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Rowan T Chlebowski; Aaron K Aragaki; Lewis H Kuller; JoAnn E Manson; Margery Gass; Elizabeth Bluhm; Stephanie Connelly; F Allan Hubbell; Dorothy Lane; Lisa Martin; Judith Ockene; Thomas Rohan; Robert Schenken; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 5.  Long-cycle treatment with oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Herbert Kuhl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  [Hormone therapy in menopause. A current update].

Authors:  V Seifert-Klauss; P-M Schumm-Draeger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  [Hypogonadism in the elderly man. Reliable diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  M Zitzmann; E Nieschlag
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  The current state of postmenopausal hormone therapy: update for neurologists and epileptologists.

Authors:  Cynthia L Harden
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.500

9.  Prospective cohort study of soy food intake and colorectal cancer risk in women.

Authors:  Gong Yang; Xiao-Ou Shu; Honglan Li; Wong-Ho Chow; Hui Cai; Xianglan Zhang; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Phosphorylation of progesterone receptor serine 400 mediates ligand-independent transcriptional activity in response to activation of cyclin-dependent protein kinase 2.

Authors:  Lisa K Pierson-Mullany; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.