Literature DB >> 14645420

Prognostic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal hormone users in a screened population.

Karla Kerlikowske1, Diana L Miglioretti, Rachel Ballard-Barbash, Donald L Weaver, Diana S M Buist, William E Barlow, Gary Cutter, Berta M Geller, Bonnie Yankaskas, Stephen H Taplin, Patricia A Carney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the risk of breast cancer and tumor characteristics among current postmenopausal hormone therapy users compared with nonusers, by duration of use.
METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2000, data were collected prospectively on 374,465 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years who underwent screening mammography. We calculated the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer (invasive or ductal carcinoma-in-situ) and type of breast cancer within 12 months of postmenopausal therapy use among current hormone users with a uterus (proxy for estrogen and progestin use) and without a uterus (proxy for estrogen use), compared with nonusers.
RESULTS: Compared with nonusers, women using estrogen and progestin for >/= 5 years were at increased risk of breast tumors of stage 0 or I (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.37 to 1.66), stage II or higher (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.63), size </= 20 mm (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.43 to 1.76), size greater than 20 mm (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.42), grade 1 or 2 (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.44 to 1.77), grade 3 or 4 (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.37 to 1.73), and estrogen receptor-positive (RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.55 to 1.90). Estrogen-only users were slightly more likely to have estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer compared with nonusers (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.23).
CONCLUSION: Use of estrogen and progestin postmenopausal hormone therapy for five years or more increased the likelihood of developing breast cancer, including both tumors with favorable prognostic features and tumors with unfavorable prognostic features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645420     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  40 in total

1.  Screening mammography use among current, former, and never hormone therapy users may not explain recent declines in breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Rod Walker; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Walter Clinton; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Risk factors for ductal, lobular, and mixed ductal-lobular breast cancer in a screening population.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Christopher I Li; Karla Kerlikowske; William E Barlow; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Andrea J Cook; Diana S M Buist; Steve R Cummings; Celine Vachon; Pamela Vacek; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane; Joann G Elmore; Sofie Sebuødegård; Solveig Roth Hoff; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Hormone therapy and fatal breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandra A Norman; Anita L Weber; A Russell Localio; Polly A Marchbanks; Giske Ursin; Brian L Strom; Linda K Weiss; Ronald T Burkman; Leslie Bernstein; Dennis M Deapen; Suzanne G Folger; Michael S Simon; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy and ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Meredith H Stowe; Darryl Carter; Elizabeth B Claus
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia have declined with less use of postmenopausal hormone treatment: findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Tehillah S Menes; Karla Kerlikowske; Shabnam Jaffer; Deborah Seger; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Socioeconomic disparities in the decline in invasive breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Prediagnostic use of hormone therapy and mortality after breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Kathleen M Egan; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; John A Baron; John M Hampton; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.