Literature DB >> 21051513

Blood flow changes caused by distal filter protection and catheter aspiration in the internal carotid artery during carotid stenting: evaluation using carotid Doppler sonography.

T Sorimachi1, K Nishino, K Morita, S Takeuchi, Y Ito, Y Fujii.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: If blood flow in the ICA is reduced by the use of a distal filter during CAS, flow stagnation proximal to the filter occurs and this increases the probability of floating debris. The floating debris that remains after filter retrieval may cause cerebral embolism. However, if blood flow is increased by aspiration of blood from the ICA through an aspiration catheter, debris could be removed while the filter is still in place. The purpose of this study was to investigate blood flow changes in the ICA induced by filter use and aspiration.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A filter-protection device (AngioGuard XP) was used during CAS in 13 consecutive patients with carotid stenosis. Blood flow velocity in the ICA was measured by carotid Doppler sonography during filter deployment, filter retrieval, and catheter aspiration.
RESULTS: Blood flow velocity significantly decreased with filter placement and significantly increased with filter retrieval in patients with normal angiographic flow (P < .05). Aspiration of a 20-mL blood sample from the proximal ICA column significantly increased the blood flow velocity (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The blood flow changes in the ICA induced by the use of a distal filter may cause cerebral embolism in filter-protected CAS. A routine aspiration method can potentially reduce the amount of migrating debris during CAS, even in cases with angiographic normal flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051513      PMCID: PMC7965725          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  12 in total

1.  Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results.

Authors:  Takatoshi Sorimachi; Kazuhiko Nishino; Junsuke Shimbo; Kenichi Morita; Yasushi Ito; Yukihiko Fujii
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters.

Authors:  Ender A Finol; Gail M Siewiorek; Christine M Scotti; Michael H Wholey; Mark H Wholey
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.487

3.  In vitro performance assessment of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Mark H Wholey; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device.

Authors:  G Maleux; P Demaerel; E Verbeken; K Daenens; S Heye; F Van Sonhoven; A Nevelsteen; G Wilms
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Embolic protection filters for carotid stenting: differences in flow obstruction depending on filter construction.

Authors:  Johanna M Hendriks; Jaap D Zindler; Aad van der Lugt; Peter M T Pattynama; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Johanna L Bosch; Lukas C van Dijk
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ivan P Casserly; Alex Abou-Chebl; Robert B Fathi; David S Lee; Jacqueline Saw; Jose E Exaire; Samir R Kapadia; Christopher T Bajzer; Jay S Yadav
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE Trial.

Authors:  Olav Jansen; Jens Fiehler; Marius Hartmann; Hartmut Brückmann
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study.

Authors:  Barry T Katzen; Frank J Criado; Stephen R Ramee; Douglas W Massop; L Nick Hopkins; Dennis Donohoe; Sidney A Cohen; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design.

Authors:  Marco Roffi; Matthias Greutmann; Urs Schwarz; Thomas F Luscher; Franz R Eberli; Beatrice Amann-Vesti
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inadvertent carotid artery occlusion due to a stent-related accordion effect: clinical experience with a retrievable stent to unfold the vascular wall and restore flow.

Authors:  Sang Yub Lee; Sung Won Youn; Ho Kyun Kim; Younghoon Kwon
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.