Literature DB >> 21037166

Improving visual short-term memory by sequencing the stimulus array.

Niklas Ihssen1, David E J Linden, Kimron L Shapiro.   

Abstract

When multiple objects are presented briefly and simultaneously in a visual array, visual short-term memory (VSTM) can maintain only a limited number of these items. The present research report reveals that splitting the to-be-remembered items into two sequential arrays significantly increases VSTM performance relative to the simultaneous presentation of the same items. A memory benefit also emerges when the full object array is flashed twice (repeated) rather than being presented continuously for the same duration. Moreover, the sequential and repetition benefits are specifically pronounced for individuals with low performance for simultaneously presented items. Our results suggest that the conventional, simultaneous presentation mode may underestimate VSTM performance due to attentional limitations and/or competition between stimulus representations. In contrast, temporal segregation of the stimulus input may help participants maximize their performance and utilize their full VSTM capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21037166     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Visual short-term memory is not improved by training.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

7.  Associative learning improves visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang; Katherine Sledge Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Robert A Bittner; Danko Nikolić; Christoph Bledowski; Rainer Goebel; David E J Linden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A dynamic neural field model of visual working memory and change detection.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Steven J Luck; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-01

10.  Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?

Authors:  Ilja G Sligte; H Steven Scholte; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  The Effects of Similarity on High-Level Visual Working Memory Processing.

Authors:  Li Yang; Lei Mo
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-12-31

4.  Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation.

Authors:  Jumana Ahmad; Garrett Swan; Howard Bowman; Brad Wyble; Anna C Nobre; Kimron L Shapiro; Fiona McNab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Dissociating distractor-filtering at encoding and during maintenance.

Authors:  Fiona McNab; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The two-stage process in visual working memory consolidation.

Authors:  Chaoxiong Ye; Tengfei Liang; Yin Zhang; Qianru Xu; Yongjie Zhu; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.