Literature DB >> 21036673

The influence of heterochromatin on DNA double strand break repair: Getting the strong, silent type to relax.

Aaron A Goodarzi1, Penny Jeggo, Markus Lobrich.   

Abstract

DNA non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) represent the major DNA double strand break (DSB) pathways in mammalian cells, whilst ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) lies at the core of the DSB signalling response. ATM signalling plays a major role in modifying chromatin structure in the vicinity of the DSB and increasing evidence suggests that this function influences the DSB rejoining process. DSBs have long been known to be repaired with two (or more) component kinetics. The majority (∼85%) of DSBs are repaired with fast kinetics in a predominantly ATM-independent manner. In contrast, ∼15% of radiation-induced DSBs are repaired with markedly slower kinetics via a process that requires ATM and those mediator proteins, such as MDC1 or 53BP1, that accumulate at ionising radiation induced foci (IRIF). DSBs repaired with slow kinetics predominantly localise to the periphery of genomic heterochromatin (HC). Indeed, there is mounting evidence that chromatin complexity and not damage complexity confers slow DSB repair kinetics. ATM's role in HC-DSB repair involves the direct phosphorylation of KAP-1, a key HC formation factor. KAP-1 phosphorylation (pKAP-1) arises in both a pan-nuclear and a focal manner after radiation and ATM-dependent pKAP-1 is essential for DSB repair within HC regions. Mediator proteins such as 53BP1, which are also essential for HC-DSB repair, are expendable for pan-nuclear pKAP-1 whilst being essential for pKAP-1 formation at IRIF. Data suggests that the essential function of the mediator proteins is to promote the retention of activated ATM at DSBs, concentrating the phosphorylation of KAP-1 at HC DSBs. DSBs arising in G2 phase are also repaired with fast and slow kinetics but, in contrast to G0/G1 where they all DSBs are repaired by NHEJ, the slow component of DSB repair in G2 phase represents an HR process involving the Artemis endonuclease. Results suggest that whilst NHEJ repairs the majority of DSBs in G2 phase, Artemis-dependent HR uniquely repairs HC DSBs. Collectively, these recent studies highlight not only how chromatin complexity influences the factors required for DSB repair but also the pathway choice.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21036673     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  116 in total

1.  The FA pathway counteracts oxidative stress through selective protection of antioxidant defense gene promoters.

Authors:  Wei Du; Reena Rani; Jared Sipple; Jonathan Schick; Kasiani C Myers; Parinda Mehta; Paul R Andreassen; Stella M Davies; Qishen Pang
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors:  Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance.

Authors:  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 4.  Patching Broken DNA: Nucleosome Dynamics and the Repair of DNA Breaks.

Authors:  Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu; Nealia House; Brendan D Price
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  DNA-PK: a dynamic enzyme in a versatile DSB repair pathway.

Authors:  Anthony J Davis; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-27

6.  Heat shock protein 90α (Hsp90α) is phosphorylated in response to DNA damage and accumulates in repair foci.

Authors:  Maria Quanz; Aurélie Herbette; Mano Sayarath; Leanne de Koning; Thierry Dubois; Jian-Sheng Sun; Marie Dutreix
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Targeted gene therapies: tools, applications, optimization.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Luther Davis; Nancy Maizels
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  ZNF365 promotes stalled replication forks recovery to maintain genome stability.

Authors:  Yuqing Zhang; Eunmi Park; Christopher S Kim; Ji-hye Paik
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Improving the efficacy of chemoradiation with targeted agents.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 10.  DNA damage, chromatin, and transcription: the trinity of aging.

Authors:  Rebecca C Burgess; Tom Misteli; Philipp Oberdoerffer
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.