Literature DB >> 20980562

Comparison of real-time PCR techniques to cytotoxigenic culture methods for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection.

C W Knetsch1, D Bakker, R F de Boer, I Sanders, S Hofs, A M D Kooistra-Smid, J Corver, K Eastwood, M H Wilcox, E J Kuijper.   

Abstract

In the past decade, the incidence of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) with a more severe course has increased in Europe and North America. Assays that are capable of rapidly diagnosing CDI are essential. Two real-time PCRs (LUMC and LvI) targeting C. difficile toxin genes (tcdB, and tcdA and tcdB, respectively) were compared with the BD GeneOhm PCR (targeting the tcdB gene), using cytotoxigenic culture as a gold standard. In addition, a real-time PCR targeting the tcdC frameshift mutation at position 117 (Δ117 PCR) was evaluated for detecting toxigenic C. difficile and the presence of PCR ribotype 027 in stool samples. In total, 526 diarrheal samples were prospectively collected and included in the study. Compared with those for cytotoxigenic culture, sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) were for PCR LUMC 96.0%, 88.0%, 66.0%, and 98.9%, for PCR LvI 100.0%, 89.4%, 69.7%, and 100.0%, for PCR Δ117 98.0%, 90.7%, 71.9%, and 99.5%, and for PCR BD GeneOhm 88.3%, 96.9%, 86.5%, and 97.4%. Compared to those with feces samples cultured positive for C. difficile type 027, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Δ117 PCR were 95.2%, 96.2%, 87.0%, and 98.7%. We conclude that all real-time PCRs can be applied as a first screening test in an algorithm for diagnosing CDI. However, the low PPVs hinder the use of the assays as stand-alone tests. Furthermore, the Δ117 PCR may provide valuable information for minimizing the spread of the epidemic C. difficile PCR ribotype 027.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20980562      PMCID: PMC3020438          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01743-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Clinical virology in real time.

Authors:  Hubert G M Niesters
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Planche; Adamma Aghaizu; Richard Holliman; Peter Riley; Jan Poloniecki; Aodhán Breathnach; Sanjeev Krishna
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Evaluation of a rapid molecular screening approach for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in general and subsequent identification of the tcdC Δ117 mutation in human stools.

Authors:  R F de Boer; J J Wijma; T Schuurman; J Moedt; B G Dijk-Alberts; A Ott; A M D Kooistra-Smid; Y T H P van Duynhoven
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia; Paola Mastrantonio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical and microbiological characteristics of community-onset Clostridium difficile infection in The Netherlands.

Authors:  M P Bauer; D Veenendaal; L Verhoef; P Bloembergen; J T van Dissel; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 7.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile-infection (CDI).

Authors:  M J T Crobach; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  A European survey of diagnostic methods and testing protocols for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  F Barbut; M Delmée; J S Brazier; J C Petit; I R Poxton; M Rupnik; V Lalande; C Schneider; P Mastrantonio; R Alonso; E Kuipjer; M Tvede
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Clostridium difficile toxin CDT induces formation of microtubule-based protrusions and increases adherence of bacteria.

Authors:  Carsten Schwan; Bärbel Stecher; Tina Tzivelekidis; Marco van Ham; Manfred Rohde; Wolf-Dietrich Hardt; Jürgen Wehland; Klaus Aktories
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Dena Lyras; Jennifer R O'Connor; Pauline M Howarth; Susan P Sambol; Glen P Carter; Tongted Phumoonna; Rachael Poon; Vicki Adams; Gayatri Vedantam; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; Julian I Rood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  19 in total

1.  A multiplex, internally controlled real-time PCR assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and identification of hypervirulent strain 027/ST-1.

Authors:  A M Hoegh; J B Nielsen; A Lester; A Friis-Møller; K Schønning
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Real-time cellular analysis coupled with a specimen enrichment accurately detects and quantifies Clostridium difficile toxins in stool.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Dazhi Jin; Jing Zhang; Janet Y Sun; Xiaobo Wang; Jeffrey Stiles; Xiao Xu; Mini Kamboj; N Esther Babady; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.

Authors:  Bo-Moon Shin; Se Jin Mun; Soo Jin Yoo; Eun Young Kuak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces of Asymptomatic Patients Admitted to the Hospital.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Terveer; Monique J T Crobach; Ingrid M J G Sanders; Margreet C Vos; Cees M Verduin; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Quantitation as Predictor of Toxin Presence in Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  M J T Crobach; N Duszenko; E M Terveer; C M Verduin; E J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M J Bruins; E Verbeek; J A Wallinga; L E S Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet; E J Kuijper; P Bloembergen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the xpert Clostridium difficile assay and its comparison with the toxin A/B enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and in-house real-time PCR assay used for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile.

Authors:  Dong Hee Whang; Shin Young Joo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 9.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Daniel Z Uslan; Zachary Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.