Dong Hee Whang1, Shin Young Joo. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile genes or toxin can be detected using several laboratory techniques. In this study, we compared the performance of the Xpert C. difficile assay with that of a toxin A/B enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA) and an in-house real-time PCR assay for the tcdB gene. METHODS: From April 2011 through January 2012, 138 soft or liquid stool samples from 138 adult patients at Paik Hospital were tested using the toxin A/B ELFA, in-house real-time PCR assay, and Xpert C. difficile assay to detect toxigenic C. difficile. Specimens were considered true positives if results were positive in both the in-house real-time PCR for tcdB gene and Xpert C. difficile assays. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the toxin A/B ELFA, in-house tcdB gene real-time PCR, and Xpert C. difficile assay were 67.6%, 97.3%, and 100.0%, respectively. The specificity of the in-house tcdB gene real-time PCR assay was 100%, while the specificity was 98.0% for the other two methods. The turnaround time (TAT) was 50 min for the Xpert C. difficile assay, 75 min for the toxin A/B ELFA, and 160 min for the in-house real-time PCR assay. CONCLUSION: The Xpert C. difficile assay and the in-house real-time PCR assay had higher sensitivity than the toxin A/B ELFA; however, the specificities of the three assays were similar. Considering its rapid TAT and high sensitivity, use of the Xpert C. difficile assay is highly recommended for rapid and accurate diagnosis of C. difficile infection.
BACKGROUND:Clostridium difficile genes or toxin can be detected using several laboratory techniques. In this study, we compared the performance of the Xpert C. difficile assay with that of a toxin A/B enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA) and an in-house real-time PCR assay for the tcdB gene. METHODS: From April 2011 through January 2012, 138 soft or liquid stool samples from 138 adult patients at Paik Hospital were tested using the toxin A/B ELFA, in-house real-time PCR assay, and Xpert C. difficile assay to detect toxigenic C. difficile. Specimens were considered true positives if results were positive in both the in-house real-time PCR for tcdB gene and Xpert C. difficile assays. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the toxin A/B ELFA, in-house tcdB gene real-time PCR, and Xpert C. difficile assay were 67.6%, 97.3%, and 100.0%, respectively. The specificity of the in-house tcdB gene real-time PCR assay was 100%, while the specificity was 98.0% for the other two methods. The turnaround time (TAT) was 50 min for the Xpert C. difficile assay, 75 min for the toxin A/B ELFA, and 160 min for the in-house real-time PCR assay. CONCLUSION: The Xpert C. difficile assay and the in-house real-time PCR assay had higher sensitivity than the toxin A/B ELFA; however, the specificities of the three assays were similar. Considering its rapid TAT and high sensitivity, use of the Xpert C. difficile assay is highly recommended for rapid and accurate diagnosis of C. difficileinfection.
Authors: Fred C Tenover; Susan Novak-Weekley; Christopher W Woods; Lance R Peterson; Thomas Davis; Paul Schreckenberger; Ferric C Fang; Andre Dascal; Dale N Gerding; Jim H Nomura; Richard V Goering; Thomas Akerlund; Alice S Weissfeld; Ellen Jo Baron; Edith Wong; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Joseph Whitmore; David H Persing Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: H Kato; N Kato; K Watanabe; N Iwai; H Nakamura; T Yamamoto; K Suzuki; S M Kim; Y Chong; E B Wasito Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 5.948