Literature DB >> 1775648

Spectral, intensive, and temporal factors influencing overshoot.

S P Bacon1, M A Smith.   

Abstract

Threshold was measured for a 10-msec, 4.0-kHz signal presented near the onset or in the temporal centre of a 400-msec noise masker. Overshoot, the difference (in dB) between these two thresholds, was seen only for masker bandwidths wider than a critical band. The threshold near masker onset, and hence overshoot, could be reduced by the presence of an additional noise that was presented continuously or gated on and off prior to masker onset. The spectral, intensive, and temporal properties of this effect were studied. When the additional noise was continuous and either bandpass filtered with a variable bandwidth or notch filtered with a variable notchwidth, the results indicated that energy both near and remote from the signal frequency contributed to the reduction in overshoot. The effect of this additional noise was highly dependent upon its relative level. When the additional noise was 400 msec in duration and the delay between its offset and the onset of the masker was varied, overshoot "recovered" to its maximum value within about 50 msec. Finally, as the duration of the additional noise was varied from 3 to 400 msec while the time between its offset and masker onset was fixed, the reduction in overshoot was virtually complete for durations of about 25-50 msec. The results are consistent with the notion that overshoot at least partly reflects peripheral adaptation, and that this adaptation is not restricted to the signal frequency channel but, rather, extends in both directions over several channels.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775648     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  13 in total

1.  Effect of human auditory efferent feedback on cochlear gain and compression.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Vit Drga; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Overshoot using very short signal delays.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Grenwelge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Hongbin Chen; Shilong Han
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

4.  The relationship between precursor level and the temporal effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relative effects of increment and pedestal duration on the detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Investigating the auditory enhancement phenomenon using behavioral temporal masking patterns.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The effect of a precursor on growth of forward masking.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.