Literature DB >> 2732381

Reductions in overshoot following intense sound exposures.

C A Champlin1, D McFadden.   

Abstract

Overshoot refers to the poorer detectability of brief signals presented soon after the onset of a masking noise compared to those presented after longer delays. In the present experiment, brief tonal signals were presented 2 or 190 ms following the onset of a broadband masker that was 200 ms in duration. These two conditions of signal delay were tested before and after a series of exposures to a tone intense enough to induce temporary threshold shift (TTS). The magnitude of the overshoot was reduced after the exposure when a TTS of at least 10 dB was induced, but not when smaller amounts of TTS were induced. The reduction in overshoot was due to a decrease in the masked thresholds with the 2-ms delay; masked thresholds with the 190-ms delay were not different pre- and post-exposure. The implication is that the mechanisms responsible for the normal overshoot effect are temporarily inactivated by the same stimulus manipulations that produce a mild exposure-induced hearing loss. Thus the result is the paradox that exposure to intense sounds can produce a loss of signal detectability in certain stimulus conditions and a simultaneous improvement in detectability in other stimulus conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2732381     DOI: 10.1121/1.397853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Overshoot using very short signal delays.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Grenwelge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Hongbin Chen; Shilong Han
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

4.  The relationship between precursor level and the temporal effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  Exploring the source of the mid-level hump for intensity discrimination in quiet and the effects of noise.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Psychoacoustic measurements of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction as a function of signal frequency.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Overshoot measured physiologically and psychophysically in the same human ears.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.