Literature DB >> 8609289

The effect of level and relative frequency region on the recovery of overshoot.

G J Overson1, S P Bacon, T M Webb.   

Abstract

Overshoot--in particular, threshold for a signal near masker onset--can be reduced by presenting a stimulus (precursor) just prior to masker onset. The recovery of overshoot can be examined by varying the delay between the offset of the precursor and the onset of the masker, where "recovery" denotes an increase in the threshold for a signal near masker onset. The present study examined the effects of stimulus level and relative frequency region on this recovery. In all experiments, the masker was a broadband of noise and the signal was a 4-kHz sinusoid. The first experiment examined the effects of masker level on overshoot in order to choose two levels (one "low" and one "high") that produced similar amounts of overshoot; these levels were used in the remaining experiments. In the second experiment, the precursor was identical to the masker, and recovery functions were measured for both low and high masker and precursor levels. there was no consistent difference in the recovery functions between the two levels. In the third experiment, the precursor was divided into two bands (one below and one above 4 kHz); one was presented continuously while the other was gated as in experiment 2. The recovery was more complete when the band above 4 kHz was gated, although the recovery was usually less than that observed in experiment 2 when (effectively) both bands were gated. The results suggest that the frequency regions on both sides of the signal are important for the recovery of overshoot, but that the frequency region above the signal may be more important than the region below.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609289     DOI: 10.1121/1.415232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Effect of human auditory efferent feedback on cochlear gain and compression.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Vit Drga; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Overshoot using very short signal delays.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Grenwelge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Investigating the auditory enhancement phenomenon using behavioral temporal masking patterns.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Overshoot measured physiologically and psychophysically in the same human ears.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Brainstem Representation of Auditory Overshoot in Guinea Pigs Using Auditory Brainstem Responses.

Authors:  Hassan Haddadzade Niri; Akram Pourbakht; Nariman Rahbar; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2021-03-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.