Literature DB >> 22498794

Agreement between specially trained and accredited optometrists and glaucoma specialist consultant ophthalmologists in their management of glaucoma patients.

J R Marks1, A K Harding, R A Harper, E Williams, S Haque, A F Spencer, C Fenerty.   

Abstract

AIMS: Optometrists are becoming increasingly involved in the co-management of glaucoma patients as the burden on the Hospital Eye Service continues to escalate. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between specially trained optometrists and glaucoma-specialist consultant ophthalmologists in their management of glaucoma patients.
METHODS: Four optometrists examined 23-25 patients each and the clinical findings, up to the point of dilation, were documented in the hospital records. The optometrist, and one of two consultant ophthalmologists, then independently examined and documented the optic-disc appearance before recording their decisions regarding the stability and management of the patient on a specially designed proforma. Percentage agreement was calculated together with kappa or weighted kappa statistics, where appropriate.
RESULTS: Agreement between consultants and optometrists in evaluating glaucoma stability was 68.5% (kappa (κ)=0.42-0.50) for visual fields, 64.5% (weighted κ=0.17-0.31) for optic discs, and 84.5% (weighted κ=0.55-0.60) for intraocular pressures. Agreement regarding medical management was 96.5% (κ=0.73-0.81) and for other glaucoma management decisions, including timing of follow-up, referral to a consultant ophthalmologist, and discharge, was 72% (weighted κ=0.65). This agreement increased to 90% following a retrospective independent then consensus review between the two consultants and when qualified agreements were included. Of the 47 glaucoma and non-glaucoma queries generated during the study, 42 resulted in a change of management.
CONCLUSION: Confirming the ability of optometrists to make appropriate decisions regarding the stability and management of glaucoma patients is essential if their involvement is to continue to develop to meet the demand of an aging population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22498794      PMCID: PMC3376302          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  13 in total

1.  The projected increase in glaucoma due to an ageing population.

Authors:  Maurice W Tuck; Ronald Pitts Crick
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists on clinical management decisions for patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  M J Banes; L E Culham; C Bunce; W Xing; A Viswanathan; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Shared care in glaucoma: a national study of secondary care lead schemes in England.

Authors:  S A Vernon; A Adair
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Optic disc progression in glaucoma: comparison of confocal scanning laser tomography to optic disc photographs in a prospective study.

Authors:  Balwantray C Chauhan; Donna M Hutchison; Paul H Artes; Joseph Caprioli; Jost B Jonas; Raymond P LeBlanc; Marcelo T Nicolela
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).

Authors:  R R A Bourne; K A French; L Chang; A D Borman; M Hingorani; W D Newsom
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Decision making in chronic glaucoma--optometrists vs ophthalmologists in a shared care service.

Authors:  Shu Ho; Stephen A Vernon
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years.

Authors:  S F Gray; P G Spry; S T Brookes; T J Peters; I C Spencer; I A Baker; J M Sparrow; D L Easty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; M C Westcott; D Kamal; D F Garway-Heath; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; J Burr; R Thomas; G Maclennan; S McPherson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  8 in total

1.  Differences in Tertiary Glaucoma Care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Aaron Y Lee; Cecilia S Lee; Matthew Pieters; April Y Maa; Glenn Cockerham; Mary G Lynch
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Glaucoma Community Care: Does Ongoing Shared Care Work?

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Elizabeth Wong; Jessie Huang; Michael Yapp; Katherine Masselos; Michael Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  Collaborative care of non-urgent macular disease: a study of inter-optometric referrals.

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) performed by optometrists for patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lee Jones; Evgenia Konstantakopoulou; Gus Gazzard
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-11

5.  Results of a Glaucoma Shared Care Model Using the Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System and Disc Damage Likelihood Scale with a Novel Scoring Scheme in New Zealand.

Authors:  Alexander J Buller
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-07

6.  Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of glaucoma among different cadres of optometrists.

Authors:  Sowmya Saravanan; Kalpa Negiloni; Rashima Asokan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.969

7.  Remote Grading of the Anterior Chamber Angle Using Goniophotographs and Optical Coherence Tomography: Implications for Telemedicine or Virtual Clinics.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Henrietta Wang; Vincent Khou; Sophia Zhang; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice.

Authors:  Kam Chun Ho; Fiona Stapleton; Louise Wiles; Peter Hibbert; Sally Alkhawajah; Andrew White; Isabelle Jalbert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.