Literature DB >> 12579165

Community refinement of glaucoma referrals.

D B Henson1, A F Spencer, R Harper, E J Cadman.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe a Manchester-based glaucoma referral refinement scheme designed to reduce the number of false-positive referrals to the hospital eye service. To report on the first years results of this scheme and its financial costs to the NHS.
METHODS: Patients with suspected glaucoma, instead of being referred to their GP and then on to the hospital eye service, were referred to a group of specially trained community optometrists working to an agreed set of referral criteria. Those patients who did not meet the referral criteria were returned to the referring optometrist, while those who met the referral criteria were referred directly to Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. The patient's GP was informed in all cases.
RESULTS: The number of suspect glaucoma cases referred to the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital was reduced by 40%. This figure is close to the percentage of false-positive referrals measured at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital prior to the onset of this study. The information accompanying referral has been improved and the scheme produces a small financial cost saving to the NHS of approximately 17 pounds sterling per patient.
CONCLUSION: Community refinement of suspect glaucoma offers some important benefits over the current referral pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12579165     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  20 in total

1.  Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.

Authors:  B Bowling; S D M Chen; J F Salmon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  The future of glaucoma clinics.

Authors:  A M S Morley; I Murdoch
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists on clinical management decisions for patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  M J Banes; L E Culham; C Bunce; W Xing; A Viswanathan; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of ophthalmic assistants as screeners for glaucoma in North India.

Authors:  S K Sinha; N Astbury
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  How to defuse a demographic time bomb: the way forward?

Authors:  J C Buchan; W Amoaku; B Barnes; A Cassels-Brown; B Y Chang; J Harcourt; D Shickle; A F Spencer; S A Vernon; C MacEwen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Patterns of adherence to NICE glaucoma guidance in two different service delivery models.

Authors:  A Chawla; I Patel; C Yuen; C Fenerty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  A technician-delivered 'virtual clinic' for triaging low-risk glaucoma referrals.

Authors:  A Kotecha; J Brookes; P J Foster
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  A systematic review of teleophthalmological studies in Europe.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service.

Authors:  N Devarajan; G S Williams; M Hopes; D O'Sullivan; D Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; J Burr; R Thomas; G Maclennan; S McPherson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.