Literature DB >> 20963407

Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone.

Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu1, Mustafa Burak Hoscan, Mehmet Ilteris Tekin, Tufan Cicek, Bulent Ozturk, Hakan Ozkardes.   

Abstract

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has become the preferred first-line approach to most patients with symptomatic urolithiasis. The purpose of this study is to assess the ideal patient position during SWL for the treatment of distal ureter stones. A total of 342 patients included in this retrospective study. 148 (108 men, 40 women) patients were included in the first group and were treated in supine position. The remaining 194 (143 men, 51 women) patients were included to second group and were treated in prone position. This study designed retrospectively. The procedure was accepted as a success if the patient was stone free or had only clinically insignificant fragments (≤3 mm) for 3 months or more after the last SWL session. Before SWL, the mean is one area in the first group was 61.32 mm2 while the mean stone area in the second group was 59.04 mm2 (p = 0.208). Mean energy, Mean energy maximum and mean number of applied shock waves of the first group was 4.65, 3.19 and 3,960, respectively. The same parameters in second group were 4.26, 3.03 and 2,953, respectively. These results show that there are statistically significant differences between two groups with respect to mean energy, mean energy maximum and mean number of applied shock waves (p = 0.003, p = 0.010, p = 0.000, respectively). Success rate was 85.1% in group 1 and 72.7% in group 2 (p = 0.006). Our results suggest that supine position is effective and better than prone position for SWL in patients with distal ureteric stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20963407     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0322-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  18 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines on urolithiasis.

Authors:  H G Tiselius; D Ackermann; P Alken; C Buck; P Conort; M Gallucci
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Dornier extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones.

Authors:  A D Jenkins
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases.

Authors:  J Graff; J Pastor; P J Funke; P Mach; T Senge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Efficacy and safety of a new-generation shockwave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteral stones: Experience with 2670 patients.

Authors:  Tulga Egilmez; Mehmet Ilteris Tekin; Murat Gonen; Ferhat Kilinc; Resit Goren; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  [Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy in the treatment of calculi of the ureter. Apropos of a series of 143 cases].

Authors:  J Amiel; K Touabi; A Peyrottes; J Toubol
Journal:  Ann Urol (Paris)       Date:  1990

7.  Comparison of the effect of body position, prone or supine, on the result of extracorpreal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with stones in the proximal ureter.

Authors:  Afshar Zomorrodi; Amirreza Elahian; Nematollah Ghorbani; Anahita Tavoosi
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2007-06

8.  Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi.

Authors:  E Guntekin; E Kukul; Z Kayacan; M Baykara; M Sevuk
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  The role of lithotripsy and its side effects.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; J Woods; P D Toth; A P Evan; J A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study.

Authors:  Min Soo Choo; Jun Hyun Han; Jong Keun Kim; Tae Young Shin; Won Ki Lee; Sang Kon Lee; Seong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Impact of official technical training for urologists on the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Atsushi Okada; Takahiro Yasui; Kazumi Taguchi; Kazuhiro Niimi; Yasuhiko Hirose; Shuzo Hamamoto; Ryosuke Ando; Yasue Kubota; Yukihiro Umemoto; Keiichi Tozawa; Shoichi Sasaki; Yutaro Hayashi; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.