Literature DB >> 8026918

Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi.

E Guntekin1, E Kukul, Z Kayacan, M Baykara, M Sevuk.   

Abstract

In 115 patients with 123 distal ureteral stones located below the lower border of the sacroiliac joint, in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed with a Siemens Lithostar Lithotriptor. Our initial experience with the prone position in 8 out of 49 cases did not reveal stone fragmentation and on the final treatment sessions shock waves were allowed to enter via the obturator or sciatic foramen whilst the patients were in the supine position, in order to compare the results of treatments performed in both positions. The mean number of treatment sessions per patient, mean number of shock waves per treatment sessions, mean shock voltage per session and mean fluoroscopy time per session were significantly lower in the supine group than in the prone group (p < 0.05 for all variables). ESWL of the distal ureteral stones in the prone position seems to have an associated patient morbidity when we compare the results of treatments performed in both positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8026918     DOI: 10.1007/bf02768238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  6 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the prone position: treatment of stones in the distal ureter or anomalous kidney.

Authors:  A D Jenkins; J Y Gillenwater
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Treatment of prevesical ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  E Becht; V Moll; D Neisius; M Ziegler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Ureteral stone management: emerging concepts.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; L P Sonda; R J Kahnoski; T A Coury; D M Newman; P G Mosbaugh; J H Mertz; R E Steele; B Frank
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Primary choice of intervention for distal ureteric stone: ureteroscopy or ESWL?

Authors:  S R el-Faqih; I Husain; P E Ekman; N D Sharma; A Chakrabarty; R Talic
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1988-07

5.  Treatment of distal ureteral calculi using rigid ureteroscope.

Authors:  J L Huffman; D H Bagley; E S Lyon
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings.

Authors:  S C Mueller; D Wilbert; J W Thueroff; P Alken
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 7.450

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone.

Authors:  Jianlin Lu; Xizhao Sun; Lei He
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

2.  The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study.

Authors:  Min Soo Choo; Jun Hyun Han; Jong Keun Kim; Tae Young Shin; Won Ki Lee; Sang Kon Lee; Seong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone.

Authors:  Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Mustafa Burak Hoscan; Mehmet Ilteris Tekin; Tufan Cicek; Bulent Ozturk; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.