Literature DB >> 2645438

The role of lithotripsy and its side effects.

J E Lingeman1, J Woods, P D Toth, A P Evan, J A McAteer.   

Abstract

The relative roles of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy currently are being debated. Both treatment modalities are applicable to most upper urinary tract calculi. However, there are some important distinctions between the 2 techniques. Over-all, extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy is associated with significantly lower morbidity than percutaneous nephrostolithotomy but stone-free rates are lower for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy than for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. This difference is slight for kidneys containing minimal stone burden but increases in direct proportion to increasing stone burden. The morbidity of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy also increases with increasing stone burden. When applied to the treatment of staghorn calculi the morbidity of both techniques is comparable but the stone-free rates are significantly better with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy produces changes in the kidney similar to that of renal trauma, consisting primarily of intraparenchymal and perirenal hemorrhage and edema. While the acute effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy are well tolerated by most patients, the long-term sequela of this form of therapy is not well established. Potential long-term adverse effects reported include loss of renal function, hypertension and an increased rate of new stone occurrence. The effect of shock waves on renal parenchyma in experimental animals is dose-dependent (number of shock waves). Magnetic resonance imaging of patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy demonstrates morphological abnormalities in or around the kidney in 63 to 85 per cent of the cases (average number of shock waves 1,200). Despite these observations the safe limits of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in humans have yet to be established. Further study regarding this issue and the potential long-term adverse effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is needed urgently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2645438     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41012-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Theory, efficacy, and adverse effects.

Authors:  J M Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-07

2.  Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Kuddusi Pancaroglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 3.  Management of complex renal calculi.

Authors:  S A Holmes; H N Whitfield
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone.

Authors:  Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Mustafa Burak Hoscan; Mehmet Ilteris Tekin; Tufan Cicek; Bulent Ozturk; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-21

5.  The effect of extracorporeal electromagnetic shock waves on renal proximal tubular function.

Authors:  Z Kirkali; G Kirkali; Y Tahiri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Efficacy and outcome of surgical intervention in patients with nephrolithiasis and chronic renal failure.

Authors:  I Singh; N P Gupta; A K Hemal; M Aron; P N Dogra; A Seth
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Treatment of renal calculi by lithotripsy: minimizing short-term shock wave induced renal damage by using antioxidants.

Authors:  Khaleel A Al-Awadi; Elijah O Kehinde; Issa Loutfi; Olusegun A Mojiminiyi; Adel Al-Hunayan; Hamdy Abdul-Halim; Ahmed Al-Sarraf; Anjum Memon; Mathew P Abraham
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-12-07

8.  Ways in which SWL affects oxidant/antioxidant balance.

Authors:  Erdal Yilmaz; Ahmet Haciislamoglu; Ucler Kisa; Ozlem Dogan; Ercan Yuvanc; Ertan Batislam
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  An experimentally-calibrated damage mechanics model for stone fracture in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Daniel Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Georgy Sankin; Ying Zhang; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Int J Fract       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Effect of SWL on renal hemodynamics: could a change in renal artery contraction-relaxation responses be the cause?

Authors:  Erdal Yilmaz; Cagatay Mert; Zuhal Keskil; Devrim Tuglu; Ertan Batislam
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.