Literature DB >> 19864527

Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model.

Sanaz A Jansen1, Tatjana Paunesku, Xiaobing Fan, Gayle E Woloschak, Stefan Vogt, Suzanne D Conzen, Thomas Krausz, Gillian M Newstead, Gregory S Karczmar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To combine dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with x-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) of mammary gland tissue samples from mice to identify the spatial distribution of gadolinium after intravenous injection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: C3(1) Sv-40 large T antigen transgenic mice (n = 23) were studied with institutional animal care and use committee approval. Twelve mice underwent DCE MR imaging after injection of gadodiamide, and gadolinium concentration-time curves were fit to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with the following parameters: transfer constant (K(trans)) and volume of extravascular extracellular space per unit volume of tissue (v(e)). Eleven mice received gadodiamide before XFM. These mice were sacrificed 2 minutes after injection, and frozen slices containing ducts distended with murine ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were prepared for XFM. One mouse received saline and served as the control animal. Elemental gadolinium concentrations were measured in and around the ducts with DCIS. Hematoxylin-eosin-stained slices of mammary tissues were obtained after DCE MR imaging and XFM.
RESULTS: Ducts containing DCIS were unambiguously identified on MR images. DCE MR imaging revealed gadolinium uptake along the length of ducts with DCIS, with an average K(trans) of 0.21 min(-1) +/- 0.14 (standard deviation) and an average v(e) of 0.40 +/- 0.16. XFM revealed gadolinium uptake inside ducts with DCIS, with an average concentration of 0.475 mmol/L +/- 0.380; the corresponding value for DCE MR imaging was 0.30 mmol/L +/- 0.13.
CONCLUSION: These results provide insight into the physiologic basis of contrast enhancement of DCIS lesions on DCE MR images: Gadolinium penetrates and collects inside neoplastic ducts. (c) RSNA, 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19864527      PMCID: PMC2770112          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2533082026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Paul Armitage; Christian Behrenbruch; Michael Brady; Niall Moore
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Quantitative imaging of metals in tissues.

Authors:  Martina Ralle; Svetlana Lutsenko
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.949

3.  Comparison of cryopreparation techniques for electron probe microanalysis of cells as exemplified by human erythrocytes.

Authors:  K Zierold
Journal:  Scanning Microsc       Date:  1992-12

Review 4.  MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  J C Weinreb; G Newstead
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency.

Authors:  C K Kuhl; H B Bieling; J Gieseke; B P Kreft; T Sommer; G Lutterbey; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  S G Orel; M H Mendonca; C Reynolds; M D Schnall; L J Solin; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?

Authors:  J P Westerhof; U Fischer; J D Moritz; J W Oestmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.

Authors:  R Gilles; M Meunier; O Lucidarme; B Zafrani; J M Guinebretière; A A Tardivon; M Le Gal; D Vanel; S Neuenschwander; R Arriagada
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Prostate and mammary adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice carrying a rat C3(1) simian virus 40 large tumor antigen fusion gene.

Authors:  I G Maroulakou; M Anver; L Garrett; J E Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues.

Authors:  D A Kovar; M Lewis; G S Karczmar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  30 in total

1.  3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Authors:  B L Stehouwer; L G Merckel; H M Verkooijen; N H G M Peters; R M Mann; K M Duvivier; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; W B Veldhuis; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge; Peter R Eby; Wendy B Demartini; Robert L Gutierrez; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  IV Administered Gadodiamide Enters the Lumen of the Prostatic Glands: X-Ray Fluorescence Microscopy Examination of a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Devkumar Mustafi; Sophie-Charlotte Gleber; Jesse Ward; Urszula Dougherty; Marta Zamora; Erica Markiewicz; David C Binder; Tatjana Antic; Stefan Vogt; Gregory S Karczmar; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Automatic segmentation of invasive breast carcinomas from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using time series analysis.

Authors:  Jagadaeesan Jayender; Sona Chikarmane; Ferenc A Jolesz; Eva Gombos
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The risk of upgrade for atypical ductal hyperplasia detected on magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy: a study of 100 cases from four academic institutions.

Authors:  Thaer Khoury; Zaibo Li; Souzan Sanati; Mohamed M Desouki; Xiwei Chen; Dan Wang; Song Liu; Rouzan Karabakhtsian; Prasanna Kumar; Beatriu Reig
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size.

Authors:  E M Fallenberg; C Dromain; F Diekmann; F Engelken; M Krohn; J M Singh; B Ingold-Heppner; K J Winzer; U Bick; D M Renz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MRI accurately identifies early murine mammary cancers and reliably differentiates between in situ and invasive cancer: correlation of MRI with histology.

Authors:  Devkumar Mustafi; Marta Zamora; Xiaobing Fan; Erica Markiewicz; Jeffrey Mueller; Suzanne D Conzen; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Subcellular redistribution and mitotic inheritance of transition metals in proliferating mouse fibroblast cells.

Authors:  Reagan McRae; Barry Lai; Christoph J Fahrni
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.526

9.  High resolution 3D MRI of mouse mammary glands with intra-ductal injection of contrast media.

Authors:  Erica Markiewicz; Xiaobing Fan; Devkumar Mustafi; Marta Zamora; Brian B Roman; Sanaz A Jansen; Kay Macleod; Suzanne D Conzen; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the natural history of in situ mammary neoplasia in transgenic mice: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Suzanne D Conzen; Xiaobing Fan; Erica J Markiewicz; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.