Literature DB >> 17983393

BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Eric L Rosen1, Stacy A Smith-Foley, Wendy B DeMartini, Peter R Eby, Sue Peacock, Constance D Lehman.   

Abstract

To identify the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI for newly diagnosed breast carcinoma prior to surgery was conducted. This yielded 381 lesions in 361 patients with pathologic confirmation of either DCIS alone, invasive carcinoma alone, or mixed invasive and in-situ disease. Presence or absence of a MRI lesion at the site of the documented carcinoma was recorded, and for all identified MRI lesions the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System morphology patterns were recorded. MRI features of the different malignancy types were compared utilizing Fisher's exact tests; 64/381 (16.8%) lesions had DCIS, 101/381 (26.5%) had invasive carcinoma, and 216/381 (56.7%) had mixed invasive/in situ carcinoma. A MRI lesion corresponding to the known cancer was identified in 55/64 (85.9%) cases of DCIS, 98/101 (97.0%) cases of invasive carcinoma, and 212/216 (98.1%) cases of mixed invasive and in-situ carcinoma. For pure DCIS lesions, 38/64 (59.4%) exhibited nonmass-like enhancement (NMLE), 9/64 (14.1%) were masses, and 8/64 (12.5%) were a focus. For pure invasive carcinomas 79/101(78.2%) were masses, 16/101 (15.8%) were NMLE, and 3/101 (3.0%) were a focus. For mixed lesions 163/216 (75.5%) were masses, 44/216 (20.4%) demonstrated NMLE, and 5/216 (2.3%) were a focus. The most common NMLE patterns of pure DCIS were segmental distribution and clumped internal enhancement. Although there is overlap in the MRI morphology and enhancement pattern of in situ and invasive breast carcinoma, DCIS more frequently manifests as NMLE than does invasive carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17983393     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00513.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  24 in total

1.  Usefulness of lesion image mapping with multidetector-row helical computed tomography using a dedicated skin marker in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Narumi Harada-Shoji; Takayuki Yamada; Takanori Ishida; Masakazu Amari; Akihiko Suzuki; Takuya Moriya; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Hideki Ota; Shunji Mugikura; Chiaki Takasawa; Junya Tominaga; Takanori Ishida; Mika Watanabe; Kei Takase; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge; Peter R Eby; Wendy B Demartini; Robert L Gutierrez; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography.

Authors:  Lifang Si; Renyou Zhai; Xiaojuan Liu; Kaiyan Yang; Li Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  The role of breast MR imaging in pre-operative determination of invasive disease for ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by needle biopsy.

Authors:  Mariko Goto; Sachiko Yuen; Kentaro Akazawa; Kaori Nishida; Eiichi Konishi; Mariko Kajihara; Nobuhiko Shinkura; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Advances in Breast MRI in the Setting of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Diana L Lam; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 0.800

8.  Value of breast MRI for patients with a biopsy showing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).

Authors:  Keiko Tsuchiya; Naoko Mori; David V Schacht; Deepa Sheth; Gregory S Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for Unenhanced Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Hee Jung Shin; Madeline Dang; Habib Rahbar; Katja Pinker; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Dustin Newell; Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Hon J Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.