Literature DB >> 20949321

Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland.

Helga Gottfreðsdóttir1, Vilhjálmur Arnason.   

Abstract

A hallmark of good antenatal care is to respect prospective parent's choices and provide information in a way that encourages their autonomy and informed decision making. In this paper, we analyse the meaning of autonomous and informed decision making from the theoretical perspective and attempt to show how those concepts are described among prospective parents in early pregnancy and in the public media in a society where NT screening is almost a norm. We use interviews with Icelandic prospective parents in early pregnancy (N = 40) and material covering the discourse around prenatal screening in the media over 5 years period. Our analysis indicates that both prospective parents and the public media include ethical terms in their rhetoric around prenatal screening although those concepts differ in their expression. We conclude that the context in which these decisions are taken does not encourage moral reflection. Prospective parents describe that there is a lack of dialogue with professionals when decisions are made about screening. With routine offer of screening the conceptualization of bioethical concepts finds its own way through a mainstream discourse which has limited connections to the theoretical notions. This has been neglected in the implementation of screening, as limited effort has been subject to audit with reference to explore how the offer of screening and informed choice is experienced among prospective parents.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20949321     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  21 in total

Review 1.  Gadamerian dialogue in the patient-professional interaction.

Authors:  V Arnason
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2000

2.  Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing?

Authors:  Clare Williams; Priscilla Alderson; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Reproductive autonomous choice--a cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Kristin Zeiler
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Clinical implications of the ethics of informed consent for first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21.

Authors:  Frank A Chervenak; Laurence B McCullough; Stephen T Chasen
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Jo Ellins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-07

Review 6.  Value neutrality in genetic counseling: an unattained ideal.

Authors:  C A Rentmeester
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

7.  Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.

Authors:  Clare Williams; Jane Sandall; Gillian Lewando-Hundt; Bob Heyman; Kevin Spencer; Rachel Grellier
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Kleanthi Gourounti; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Framing the fetus in medical work: rituals and practices.

Authors:  Clare Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.

Authors:  Elisa García; Danielle R M Timmermans; Evert van Leeuwen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  Decision-making process of prenatal screening described by pregnant women and their partners.

Authors:  Inger Wätterbjörk; Karin Blomberg; Kerstin Nilsson; Eva Sahlberg-Blom
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Is advice incompatible with autonomous informed choice? Women's perceptions of advice in the context of antenatal screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Louise D Bryant; Zahra Tizro; Darren Shickle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Melania Elena Pop-Tudose; Dana Popescu-Spineni; Petru Armean; Ioan Victor Pop
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  The Cognitive Approach to Bioethical Issues in Perinatal Care in Greece.

Authors:  Anna Glynou; Elena Frysira; Kalliopi Christakakou-Fotiadi; Makarios Eleftheriadis; Angeliki Sarella; Iosifina Stergiotou; Maria Koukaki; Eirini Chasalevri; Dionysios Galatis; Nicolaos Salakos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.