Literature DB >> 15379192

Reproductive autonomous choice--a cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Kristin Zeiler1.   

Abstract

Enhancement of autonomous choice may be considered as an important reason for facilitating the use of genetic tests such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The principle of respect for autonomy is a crucial component not only of Western liberal traditions but also of Western bioethics. This is especially so in bioethical discussions and analyses of clinical encounters within medicine. On the basis of an analysis of qualitative research interviews performed with British, Italian and Swedish geneticists and gynaecologists on ethical aspects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, the plausibility of the notion of autonomy within reproductive medicine is discussed. The analysis of interviews indicates not only that there is a gap between theoretical discussions and concrete practice, but also that an increase in choice--paradoxically--can hamper couples' choice.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15379192     DOI: 10.1023/b:mhep.0000034323.68025.d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  3 in total

1.  Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hildt
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

2.  Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction.

Authors:  John A Robertson
Journal:  South Calif Law Rev       Date:  1986-07

3.  Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification.

Authors:  A H Handyside; J K Pattinson; R J Penketh; J D Delhanty; R M Winston; E G Tuddenham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland.

Authors:  Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Vilhjálmur Arnason
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-02

2.  Obligatory Effort [Hishtadlut] as an Explanatory Model: A Critique of Reproductive Choice and Control.

Authors:  Elly Teman; Tsipy Ivry; Heela Goren
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06

3.  How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.

Authors:  Tamara Kayali Browne
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 4.  A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the scope of preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Maria Siermann; Zoë Claesen; Laurent Pasquier; Taneli Raivio; Olga Tšuiko; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Pascal Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 5.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

6.  A qualitative inquiry of the financial concerns of couples opting to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent the transmission of known genetic disorders.

Authors:  Kathryn T Drazba; Michele A Kelley; Patricia E Hershberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Testing the embryo, testing the fetus.

Authors:  K Ehrich; B Farsides; C Williams; Rosamund Scott
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2007-12-01

8.  Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care.

Authors:  Amal Matar; Anna T Höglund; Pär Segerdahl; Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.