Literature DB >> 17316936

Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey.

Kleanthi Gourounti1, Jane Sandall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the knowledge and attitudes towards Down's syndrome screening among pregnant women presenting for prenatal screening in Greece, in order to explore whether Greek women are able to make informed choices.
DESIGN: survey using self-administered questionnaires.
SETTING: public hospital in Athens, Greece. PARTICIPANTS: 135 pregnant women with a gestational age of between 11 and 20 weeks, just before antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.
FINDINGS: a total of 96% of women had a positive attitude towards screening and 45% had a good level of knowledge concerning the screening process for Down's syndrome. A standard measure of informed choice was used, which was validated for use in Greek. We found that 44% of women made an informed choice and 56% of women made an uninformed choice. This was because of the low percentage of women with a good level of knowledge. It was also found that knowledge and attitudes were not associated and seemed to be independent of each other. A higher level of informed choice was associated with a higher level of educational achievement and income, time of decision-making and the satisfaction with the decision.
CONCLUSIONS: health professionals should ensure that all women receive appropriate and intelligible information about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. This information should be suited to women's learning ability in order to increase their knowledge before undergoing screening. Health professionals should educate and increase women's knowledge, and also give women a chance to explore their attitudes and discuss the issues involved. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: on the basis of the current measure of informed choice, we found that knowledge is a weak determinant of uptake of screening. However, the measure focuses on knowledge regarding the screening process, rather than on the condition itself. In addition, informed choice is a far broader concept than the issues covered by the measurement tool. Therefore, it could be concluded that attempts to increase attitude-behaviour consistency (i.e. to increase uptake for women with positive attitudes towards screening and to decrease uptake for women with negative attitudes) could be more successful in increasing informed choice in screening for Down's syndrome in Greece.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17316936     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  14 in total

1.  Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland.

Authors:  Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Vilhjálmur Arnason
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-02

2.  Patients' Knowledge of Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21.

Authors:  Michal Sheinis; Kira Bensimon; Amanda Selk
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening.

Authors:  Alice G Ames; Alice Jaques; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Alison D Archibald; Rony E Duncan; Jon Emery; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  A randomized trial of a prenatal genetic testing interactive computerized information aid.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Michael Wolf; Rebecca Mullen; Ashley R Bergeron; Stacy Cooper Bailey; Robert Levine; William A Grobman
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  NIPT and Informed Consent: an Assessment of Patient Understanding of a Negative NIPT Result.

Authors:  Julie L Piechan; Karrie A Hines; Daniel L Koller; Kristyne Stone; Kimberly Quaid; Wilfredo Torres-Martinez; Divya Wilson Mathews; Tatiana Foroud; Lola Cook
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A qualitative study looking at informed choice in the context of non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Heather Skirton; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  A comparison of face to face and group education on informed choice and decisional conflict of pregnant women about screening tests of fetal abnormalities.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Sahar Riyazi; Marziyeh Lotfalizade; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Hoseyn Jafari Suny
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.

Authors:  A Kater-Kuipers; E M Bunnik; I D de Beaufort; R J H Galjaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.