Literature DB >> 17996350

The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.

Elisa García1, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome and other chromosomal anomalies has become common obstetrical practice. The purpose of this intervention is to provide women with the information needed to make informed reproductive choices. It is assumed that the ethical beliefs of parents play an important role in decision-making about whether to undergo testing, but little is known about their precise significance. More insight into how women conceptualize their choice of using prenatal screening tests may clarify the impact of personal ethical beliefs. With this aim, we conducted qualitative research consisting of semi-structured interviews with 59 women in the Netherlands who were offered a prenatal screening test. The analysis showed that the ethical views between acceptors and decliners showed similar diversity. In contrast with the currently accepted view, we conclude that ethical beliefs are one of the factors implicated in the decision. Women decide about prenatal testing by balancing the information provided by the test against the risks of further investigation, the emotional burden of a disabled child on their well-being and life perspective, as well as on those of family members. Normative moral principles are introduced once the choice is made, namely as factors in justifying and supporting the decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17996350     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

1.  Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Mareike Stiel; Jacky Boivin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland.

Authors:  Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Vilhjálmur Arnason
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-02

3.  Decision-making process of prenatal screening described by pregnant women and their partners.

Authors:  Inger Wätterbjörk; Karin Blomberg; Kerstin Nilsson; Eva Sahlberg-Blom
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Why do pregnant women accept or decline prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome?

Authors:  Ellen Ternby; Ove Axelsson; Göran Annerén; Peter Lindgren; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-07-20

5.  A holistic approach to education programs in thalassemia for a multi-ethnic population: consideration of perspectives, attitudes, and perceived needs.

Authors:  Li Ping Wong; Elizabeth George; Jin-Ai Mary Anne Tan
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-02-24

6.  Demographic and experiential correlates of public attitudes towards cell-free fetal DNA screening.

Authors:  Lauren C Sayres; Megan Allyse; Taylor A Goodspeed; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Influence of anchoring on miscarriage risk perception associated with amniocentesis.

Authors:  Regina Nuccio; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Joan Mastrobattista; Sarah Jane Noblin; Jerrie Refuerzo; Janice L Smith; Claire N Singletary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening.

Authors:  Rachèl V van Schendel; Johanna H Kleinveld; Wybo J Dondorp; Eva Pajkrt; Danielle R M Timmermans; Kim C A Holtkamp; Margreet Karsten; Anne L Vlietstra; Augusta M A Lachmeijer; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age.

Authors:  M Allyse; L C Sayres; T A Goodspeed; M K Cho
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Examining the ethical and social issues of health technology design through the public appraisal of prospective scenarios: a study protocol describing a multimedia-based deliberative method.

Authors:  Pascale Lehoux; Philippe Gauthier; Bryn Williams-Jones; Fiona A Miller; Jennifer R Fishman; Myriam Hivon; Patrick Vachon
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.