Literature DB >> 20947766

Selection at linked sites shapes heritable phenotypic variation in C. elegans.

Matthew V Rockman1, Sonja S Skrovanek, Leonid Kruglyak.   

Abstract

Mutation generates the heritable variation that genetic drift and natural selection shape. In classical quantitative genetic models, drift is a function of the effective population size and acts uniformly across traits, whereas mutation and selection act trait-specifically. We identified thousands of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) influencing transcript abundance traits in a cross of two Caenorhabditis elegans strains; although trait-specific mutation and selection explained some of the observed pattern of QTL distribution, the pattern was better explained by trait-independent variation in the intensity of selection on linked sites. Our results suggest that traits in C. elegans exhibit different levels of variation less because of their own attributes than because of differences in the effective population sizes of the genomic regions harboring their underlying loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947766      PMCID: PMC3138179          DOI: 10.1126/science.1194208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  31 in total

1.  Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  Scott A Rifkin; Junhyong Kim; Kevin P White
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression.

Authors:  Christian R Landry; Bernardo Lemos; Scott A Rifkin; W J Dickinson; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Cis and trans regulatory effects contribute to natural variation in transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Anne Genissel; Lauren M McIntyre; Marta L Wayne; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Consequences of recombination rate variation on quantitative trait locus mapping studies. Simulations based on the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  M A Noor; A L Cunningham; J C Larkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans.

Authors:  M de Bono; C I Bargmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Meiotic recombination, noncoding DNA and genomic organization in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  T M Barnes; Y Kohara; A Coulson; S Hekimi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger; Paul A Hohenlohe; Beverley C Ajie; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  A genome-wide view of Caenorhabditis elegans base-substitution mutation processes.

Authors:  Dee R Denver; Peter C Dolan; Larry J Wilhelm; Way Sung; J Ignacio Lucas-Lledó; Dana K Howe; Samantha C Lewis; Kazu Okamoto; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genomic analysis of the relationship between gene expression variation and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Mara K N Lawniczak; Alisha K Holloway; David J Begun; Corbin D Jones
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  112 in total

1.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Quantitative traits: Variants dragged down by their neighbours.

Authors:  Louisa Flintoft
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Pádraic Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Association mapping reveals the role of purifying selection in the maintenance of genomic variation in gene expression.

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; Young Wha Lee; John R Stinchcombe; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The evolution of genetic architectures underlying quantitative traits.

Authors:  Etienne Rajon; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The effects of genetic variation on gene expression dynamics during development.

Authors:  Mirko Francesconi; Ben Lehner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Crossover heterogeneity in the absence of hotspots in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Taniya Kaur; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  New experiments for an undivided genetics.

Authors:  Michael R Rose; Laurence D Mueller; Molly K Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The joint effects of background selection and genetic recombination on local gene genealogies.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Expression quantitative trait locus mapping across water availability environments reveals contrasting associations with genomic features in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  David B Lowry; Tierney L Logan; Luca Santuari; Christian S Hardtke; James H Richards; Leah J DeRose-Wilson; John K McKay; Saunak Sen; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.