Literature DB >> 20936121

Bmi-1 Regulates Snail Expression and Promotes Metastasis Ability in Head and Neck Squamous Cancer-Derived ALDH1 Positive Cells.

Cheng-Chia Yu1, Wen-Liang Lo, Yi-Wei Chen, Pin-I Huang, Han-Shui Hsu, Ling-Ming Tseng, Shih-Chieh Hung, Shou-Yen Kao, Charn-Jung Chang, Shih Hwa Chiou.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that ALDH1 is a putative marker for HNSCC-derived cancer stem cells. However, the regulation mechanisms that maintain the stemness and metastatic capability of HNSCC-ALDH1(+) cells remain unclear. Initially, HNSCC-ALDH1(+) cells from HNSCC patient showed cancer stemness properties, and high expression of Bmi1 and Snail. Functionally, tumorigenic properties of HNSCC-ALDH1(+) cells could be downregulated by knockdown of Bmi-1. Overexpression of Bmi-1 altered in expression property ALDH1(-) cells to that of ALDH1(+) cells. Furthermore, knockdown of Bmi-1 enhanced the radiosensitivity of radiation-treated HNSCC-ALDH1(+) cells. Moreover, overexpression of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1(-) cells increased tumor volume and number of pulmonary metastatic lesions by xenotransplant assay. Importantly, knock-down of Bmi1 in HNSCC-ALDH1(+) cells significantly decreased distant metastases in the lungs. Clinically, coexpression of Bmi-1/Snail/ALDH1 predicted the worst prognosis in HNSCC patients. Collectively, our data suggested that Bmi-1 plays a key role in regulating Snail expression and cancer stemness properties of HNSCC-ALDH1(+) cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20936121      PMCID: PMC2948925          DOI: 10.1155/2011/609259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol        ISSN: 1687-8450            Impact factor:   4.375


1. Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), is the sixth most prevalent type of malignancy worldwide and accounts for approximately 8% to 10% of all cancers in Southeast Asia [1, 2]. HNSCC-related mortality is mainly caused by cervical lymph node metastasis, and occasionally by distant organ metastasis [3]. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process in which epithelial cells lose their polarity and adopt a mesenchymal phenotype [4]. This process is thought to be a critical step in the induction of tumor metastasis and malignancy [5]. Mani et al. demonstrated that induction of EMT results in cells that have stem cell properties and generates cells with properties similar to breast cancer stem cells [6]. Snail, a member of the zinc-finger transcription factor family, is one of the master regulators that promotes EMT and mediates invasiveness as well as metastasis in many different types of malignant tumors [7, 8]. The aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) family of enzymes is comprised of cytosolic isoenzymes that oxidize intracellular aldehydes and contribute to the oxidation of retinol to retinoic acid in early stem cell differentiation [9]. Recently, ALDH has been reported to be a unique marker of head and neck cancer stem cells (CSC) [10, 11]. ALDH1 was also found to co-localize with other CSCs-related markers, including MMP-9, CD44, and CK14, at the invasive front of the tumor [12]. We previously reported the isolation of ALDH1-positive cells from patients with HNSCC [13]. These HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells displayed the radioresistance and represented a reservoir of cells that have the proliferative potential to generate tumors [13]. ALDH1+-lineage cells underwent EMT and endogenously co-expressed Snail [13]. These findings suggested that Snail expression may regulate the tumorigenesis, radiochemoresistance, and cancer stem cell properties of malignant HNSCC tumors [13]. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in mediating metastasis and tumor malignancy of HNSCC-CSC through the regulation of Snail remain unknown. Bmi-1 is a member of the Polycomb (PcG) family of transcriptional repressors that mediate gene silencing by regulating chromatin structure [14]. Bmi-1 is essential for maintaining the ability of neural, hematopoietic, and intestinal stem cells to self-renew [15-17]. Bmi-1 was identified as a proto-oncogene that cooperates with MYC to promote the generation of lymphoma [18]. Bmi-1 also inhibited MYC-induced apoptosis by repressing the Cdkn2a locus [19]. Additionally, Bmi-1 has been verified as a predictor of prognosis in bladder cancer [20], prostate cancer [21], brain cancer [22, 23], breast cancer [24], pancreatic cancer [25], and lung cancer [26]. Bmi-1 has been demonstrated to play a role in the tumorigenesis of HNSCC [27, 28]. Bmi-1 has also been reported to be involved in tumor metastasis [29, 30]. Recently, an elegant study by Song et al. showed that Bmi-1 can directly promote EMT and malignancy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by regulating Snail [31]. The goal of this study was to clarify the relationship between Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 in HNSCC or HNSCC-associated CSC and the involved molecular mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Cultivation of HNSCC-Derived ALDH1+ and ALDH1− Cells from HNSCC Patients

This study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All samples were obtained after patients provided informed consent. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board of Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The information of HNSCC patients has been previously described in Table 1. The dissociated cells from the samples of HNSCC patients were suspended at 1 × 106 cells/mL in 37°C DMEM supplemented with 2% FCS. The identification of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) positive HNSCC cells was carried out using the Aldefluor assay (StemCell Technologies, Durham, NC, USA) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Cells were suspended in ALDEFLUOR assay buffer containing ALDH substrate (BAAA, 1 μmol/l per 1 × 106 cells) and incubated for 40 min at 37°C. As a negative control, for each sample of cells, an aliquot was treated with 50 mmol/l diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), a specific ALDH inhibitor. The sorting gates were established using the cells stained with PI only as a negative control; the ALDEFLUOR-stained cells treated with DEAB and staining with a secondary antibody alone to test for viability. HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells were cultured in a medium consisting of serum-free DMEM/F12 (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), N2 supplement (R and D Systems Inc., Minneapolis), 10 ng/mL bFGF (R and D Systems), and 10 ng/mL EGF (R and D Systems) [13, 32].
Table 1

Case description, tumorigenic characteristics and treatment effects of ALDH1+ and ALDH1− HNSCC.

Number of cells injected
CaseAge/SexALDH+ (%)SpheresParentalALDH1+ ALDH1+ (Sh-Bmi 1)ALDH1 ALDH1 (Bmi 1Over)
Formation
171/ M44.2Yes1,000 (0/3)1,000 (1/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (1/3)
3,000 (0/3)3,000 (3/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (1/3)
10,000 (1/3)10,000 (3/3)10,000 (2/3)10,000 (1/3)10,000 (2/3)

273/ F24.7Yes1,000 (0/3)1,000 (1/3)1,000 (1/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)
3,000 (0/3)3,000 (2/3)3,000 (2/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (1/3)
10,000 (2/3)10,000 (2/3)10,000 (2/3)10,000 (0/3)10,000 (2/3)

361 / F8.6Yes1,000 (0/3)1,000 (1/3)1,000 (1/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)
3,000 (0/3)3,000 (3/3)3,000 (1/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (2/3)
10,000 (0/3)10,000 (3/3)10,000 (2/3)10,000 (0/3)10,000 (3/3)

471 / M1.2Yes1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)
3,000 (0/3)3,000 (3/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (2/3)
10,000 (0/3)10,000 (3/3)10,000 (2/3)10,000 (0/3)10,000 (3/3)

569 / M19.2Yes1,000 (0/3)1,000 (1/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)
3,000 (0/3)3,000 (3/3)3,000 (1/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (2/3)
10,000 (1/3)10,000 (3/3)10,000 (2/3)10,000 (0/3)10,000 (3/3)

672 / M5.5Yes1,000 (0/3)1,000 (1/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)1,000 (0/3)
3,000 (0/3)3,000 (3/3)3,000 (1/3)3,000 (0/3)3,000 (2/3)
10,000 (0/3)10,000 (3/3)10,000 (1/3)10,000 (0/3)10,000 (2/3)

ALDH1+: ALDH1-positive HNSCC cells; ALDH1−: ALDH1-negative HNSCC cells.

ALDH1+ or ALDH1+cells were injected into neck of SCID mice.

2.2. Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

Briefly, total RNA (1 μg) of each sample was reverse-transcribed using 0.5 μg oligo dT and 200 U Superscript II RT (Invitrogen). The primer sequences for real-time RT-PCR were listed in Table 2. The amplification was carried out in a total volume of 20 μL containing 0.5 μmol·L−1 of each primer, 4 mmol·L−1 MgCl2, 2 μL LightCyclerTM-FastStart DNA Master SYBR green I (Roche Molecular Systems, Alameda, CA), and 2 μL of 1 : 10 diluted cDNA. PCR reactions were prepared in duplicate and performed using the following program: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 sec, annealing at 55°C for 5 sec, and extension at 72°C for 20 sec. Standard curves (cycle threshold values versus template concentration) were prepared for each target gene and for the endogenous reference gene (GAPDH) for each sample. Quantification of unknown samples was performed using LightCycler Relative Quantification Software version 3.3 (Roche).
Table 2

The sequences for the primers of quantitative RT-PCR.

Gene(Accession No.)Primer Sequence (5′ to 3′)Product size (bp)Tm (°C)
Oct-4(NM_002701)F: GTGGAGAGCAACTCCGATG8660
R: TGCTCCAGCTTCTCCTTCTC

Nanog(NM_024865)F: ATTCAGGACAGCCCTGATTCTTC7660
R: TTTTTGCGACACTCTTCTCTGC

SOX-2(NM_003106)F: CGAGTGGAAACTTTTGTCGGA7460
R: TGTGCAGCGCTCGCAG

Musashi(NM_002442)F: TCCCTCGGCGAGCACA6460
R: GACAGCCCCCCCACAAA

c-Myc(NM_002467)F: GGAACGAGCTAAAACGGAGCT7155
R: GGCCTTTTCATTGTTTTCCAACT

β-catenin(NM_001904)F: CCAGCCGACACCAAGAAG13055
R: CGAATCAATCCAACAGTAGCC

Bmi1(NM_ 005180)FAAATGCTGGAGAACTGGAAAG12450
RCTGTGGATGAGGAGACTGC

Nestin(NM_006617)F: AGGAGGAGTTGGGTTCTG11250
R: GGAGTGGAGTCTGGAAGG

Snail(NM_005985)F:GCTGCCAATGCTCATCTGGGACTCT30055
R: TTGAAGGGCTTTCGAGCCTGGAGAT

Slug(NM_003068)F: GTGATTATTTCCCCGTATCTCTAT29250
R: CAATGGCATGGGGGTCTGAAAG

MDR-1 (NM_000927)F: TGGCAAAGAAATAAAGCGACTGA7660
R: CAGGATGGGCTCCTGGG

MRP-1(X60111)F: GCTTCCTCTTGGTGATATTCG17650
R: GCAGTTCAACGCATAGTGG

ABCG2(NM_004827)F: CATGTACTGGCGAAGAATATTTGGT7460
R: CACGTGATTCTTCCACAAGCC

GAPDH(NM_002046)F: CATCATCCCTGCCTCTACTG18060
R: GCCTGCTTCACCACCTTC

2.3. Knockdown and Overexpression of Bmi-1 with Lentivirus

The pLVRNAi vector was purchased from Biosettia Inc. (Biosettia, San Diego CA). The oligonucleotide 5′-AAAACCTAATACTTTCCAGATTGATTTGGAT CCAAATCAATCTGGAAAGTATTAGG-3′ targeting human Bmi-1 (NM_005180, nt 1061–1081) was synthesized and cloned into pLVRNAi to generate the lentiviral expression vector, pLVRNAi/sh-Bmi1. The lentiviral expression vector carrying Bmi-1 full-length cDNA, pLV/Bmi-1 was obtained from Biosettia Inc. pCMVΔR8.9 and pMD.G, expressing GAG-POL and the vesicular stomatitis virus envelope, respectively, were provided by the consortium (Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan). The lentiviruses were generated by cotransfecting 5 × 106 293FT cells per 10 cm plate with lentiviral vector and packaging plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (LF2000, Invitrogen). Supernatants were collected 48 hours after transfection and filtered. The 48-hour posttransduction viral titers were determined by FACS. Subconfluent cells were infected with lentivirus at a multiplicity of infection of 5 in the presence of 8 μg/mL polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich) [13, 33].

2.4. Microarray Analysis and Bioinformatics

Total RNA was extracted from cells using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Bethesda, MD, USA) and the Qiagen RNAeasy (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) column for purification. Affymetrix HG U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays containing 54,675 probe sets for >47,000 transcripts and variants, including 38,500 human genes. A typical probeset contains eleven 25-mer oligo nucleotide pairs (a perfect match and a mismatch control). For microarray analysis, sample labeling, hybridization, and staining were carried out by Affymetrix standard protocol with affyQCReport. Probeset was normalized with loess method of all microarrays. The average linkage distance was used to assess the similarity between two groups of gene expression profiles as described below. The difference in distance between two groups of sample expression profiles to a third was assessed by comparing the corresponding average linkage distances (the mean of all pairwise distances (linkages) between members of the two groups concerned). The error of such a comparison was estimated by combining the standard errors (the standard deviation of pairwise linkages divided by the square root of the number of linkages) of the average linkage distances involved. Classical multidimensional scaling (MDS) was performed using the standard function of the R program to provide a visual impression of how the various sample groups are related.

2.5. In Vivo Tumor Growth and Metastasis

All procedures involving animals were in accordance with the institutional animal welfare guidelines of Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Eight-week-old SCID mice and/or nude mice (BALB/c strain) were injected with 105 cells orthotopically. In vivo GFP imaging was performed using an illuminating device (LT-9500 Illumatool/TLS equipped with an excitation source (470 nm) and filter plate (515 nm)). Tumor size was measured with calipers and the tumor volume was calculated using the formula (Length × Width2)/2. The integrated optical density of green fluorescence intensity was captured and analyzed using Image Pro-plus software [33, 34].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package of Social Sciences software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. An independent Student's t-test was used to compare the continuous variables between groups. The Kaplan-Meier procedure was used to calculate survival probability estimates. A log-rank test was used to compare the cumulative survival durations in different patient groups. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05 for all tests.

3. Results

3.1. HNSCC-Derived ALDH1-Positive Cells Displayed Tumorigenic and Stemness Properties

Initially, parental, isolated ALDH1+, and ALDH1− cells were isolated from tissue samples of six HNSCC patients using the Aldefluor assay and the fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (Figure 1(a) and Table 1) [13, 35]. It has been reported that cancer stem-like cells can be cultured in suspension to generate floating spheroid-like bodies (SB) under serum-free medium with bFGF and EGF [36]. Interestingly, ALDH1+ increased higher tumor spheres-forming capability than that of ALDH1− (Figure 1(b)). Furthermore, ALDH1+-derived spheres with regular 10% serum cultivation increased epithelial-attached cells and differentiation marker (CK18)(See Figure 1(a) in supplementary material available online at doi: 10.1155/2011/609259).To evaluate the enhancement of tumorigenicity of HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells, soft agar colony formation assays and Matrigel/Transwell-invasion and were examined. Compared with parental and ALDH1−, ALDH1+ derived from HNSCC Patients no.1 and no. 2 showed colony-forming ability and higher invasion activity (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). To evaluate the in vivo tumor initiating capability of ALDH1+ and ALDH1−, we injected 1000, 3000, and 104 cells into the neck of SCID mice. The results showed that 104 ALDH1− did not induce tumor formation but 3,000 ALDH1+ from the HNSCC tissues of six patients in xenotransplanted mice all resulted in the generation of visible tumors 6 weeks after injection (Table 1).The results of xenotransplanted analysis further showed that ALDH1+ demonstrated higher abilities to induce tumor growth (Figure 1(e)). Lastly, serial xenotransplanted analysis suggested that ALDH1+ had in vivo self-renewal ability (Supplementary Figure 1(b)). Based on these findings, the ALDH1+-lineage cells isolated from HNSCC patients presented the significant tumor-initiating abilities, especially in ALDH1+ cells from patients no. 1 and no. 2. Real-time RT-PCR data demonstrated that the stemness and EMT-related genes (especially in Bmi-1 and Snail) were significantly activated in HNSCC ALDH1+ (Table 2 and data not shown).
Figure 1

Isolation and Characterization of HNSCC-derived ALDH1-positive Cells. (a) Analyzing and sorting ALDH1+-positive and ALDH1−-negative from HNSCC tissues via FACScan. DEAB, an inhibitor of ALDH1, was used for negative control. (b) Evaluation of sphere body formation in the parental cells, ALDH1− cells, and ALDH1+cells. Sphere bodies were counted after 1 week. The numbers of resultant colonies (c) and invasion cells (d) from parental cells, ALDH1+ cells, and ALDH1−cells were counted in vitro. (e) Macroscopic features of cells in a nude mouse at 6 weeks after xenotransplantation. Blue arrow indicates the site of injection of ALDH1−cells. Red arrow indicates the site of injection of ALDH1+cells. Yellow arrow indicates the site of injection of ALDH1+cells. *P < .05. Data shown here are the mean ± SD of three experiments.

3.2. Knockdown of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1+ Cells Down-Regulates Snail and Lessens in vitro Tumorigenicity

To further investigate the role of Bmi-1 in maintaining the biological properties of HNSCC-ALDH1+, we used a loss-of-function approach, in which Bmi-1 was knocked down by small hairpin RNA (shRNA) in HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells. Stable knockdown of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells was achieved by transduction with lentivirus that expressed shRNA targeting Bmi-1 (sh-Bmi-1). Lentivirus that expressed shRNA targeted against luciferase (sh-Luc.) was used as a control. Western blot analysis confirmed that shBmi-1 repressed Bmi-1 protein expression in HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells (Figure 2(a)). Importantly, silencing Bmi-1 expression led to downregulation of Snail and ALDH1 expression (Figure 2(a)). Additionally, our results showed that silencing of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells inhibited the ability of the cells to form colonies on soft agar (Figure 2(b)) and migrate/invade (Figure 2(c)).
Figure 2

Overexpression of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1− cells or knockdown of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH+ cells modulates Snail expression and tumorigenicity in vitro. (a) Down-regulation of Bmi-1 mediated by lentiviral shRNA and expression of Snail and ALDH1 in HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells was analyzed by western blot. Colony formation (b) and migration/invasion ability (c) of shLuc.-expressing and shBmi-1-expressing HNSCC-ALDH1+cells was determined. (d) Total protein was prepared from control GFP–expressing andBmi-1-overexpressing HNSCC-ALDH1− cells and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Bmi-1, anti-Snail, anti-ALDH1, or anti-GAPDH antibodies as indicated. The amount of GAPDH protein from each crude cell extract was used as loading control. Colony formation (e) and migration/invasion ability (f) of Bmi-1-overexpressing and control-GFP-expressing HNSCC-ALDH1− were analyzed. *P < .05. Data shown here are the mean ± SD of three experiments.

3.3. Overexpression of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1− Cells Enhances Tumorigenic Properties by Upregulating Snail

To evaluate whether overexpression of Bmi-1 could enhance the tumorigenic properties of HNSCC-ALDH1− cells, we generated stable Bmi-1-overexpressing (Bmi-1Over) HNSCCs using lentiviral transduction (Figure 2(d)). Total proteins from HNSCC-ALDH1 overexpressing Bmi-1 exhibited elevated expression of Snail and ALDH1 (Figure 2(d)). In addition, overexpression of Bmi-1 significantly increased soft agar colony formation (Figure 2(e)), and migration/invasion of HNSCC-ALDH− cells (Figure 2(f)). Taken together, our results suggest that Bmi-1 modulates the in vitro tumorigenic properties in HNSCC-ALDH1+ or ALDH1− cells by regulating Snail.

3.4. Overexpression of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1− Cells Promotes Stemness Properties

To explore molecules governing stemness and tumorigenicity in HNSCC-CD44ALDH1− cells treated with Bmi1-overexpressing lentivirus, we examined their transcriptome profile using gene expression microarray analysis (Figure 3(a)). Principle component analysis (PCA) further showed that the transcriptome profile of HNSCC-ALDH1− cells overexpressing Bmi-1 demonstrated higher expression levels of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) transcriptomes (Table 3 and Figure 3(b)). Multidimensional scaling analysis further demonstrated that HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells and HNSCC-ALDH1− cells overexpressing Bmi-1 are more similar to ESCs than HNSCC-ALDH1− cells (*P < .05; Figure 3(c)). To validate the microarray analysis results, real-time PCR was performed to confirm that the mRNA expression levels of the embryonic genes (Oct-4, Nanog, Sox2, KLF4, and Lin28), EMT-related genes (Snail and Slug), and drug-resistant-related genes (MDR-1 and ABCG2) in Bmi-1-overexpressing ALDH1− cells were significantly higher than those in ALDH1− cells (*P < .05; Table 2 and Figure 3(d)).
Figure 3

Stemness properties were enhanced in HNSCC-ALDH1− cells when Bmi-1 was overexpressed. (a) Gene expression microarray analysis (Gene tree) for altered genes differentially expressed in Bmi-1-overexpressing HNSCC-ALDH1− cells compared to HNSCC-ALDH1− cells by a hierarchy heat map. The time dependent changes of altered genes are presented on a log scale of expression values provided by GeneSpring GX software. (b) Principle component analysis (PCA) demonstrated that overexpression of Bmi-1 in HNSCC-ALDH1− cells could enhance the gene signature of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in HNSCC-ALDH1− cells. (c) Multidimensional scaling analysis. Average lineage transcriptome distances between HNSCC-ALDH1+, HNSCC-ALDH1−, HNSCC-ALDH1+/sh-Bmi-1, and HNSCC-ALDH1−/Bmi1over cells. *P < .05. (d) Transcripts of Oct-4, Nanog, Sox2, KLF4, Lin28, Snail, Slug, MDR-1, and ABCG2 in HNSCC-ALDH1− and HNSCC-ALDH1−/Bmi-1over cells (*P < .05: ALDH1− versus Bmi-1-overexpressing ALDH1−).

Table 3

The expression profiling of up-regulated genes in ALDH1−/Bmi1-overexpressed as compared to ALDH1− HNSCC.

Probe set IDGene symbolGene title
217757_atA2Malpha-2-macroglobulin
209459_s_atABAT4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase
213353_atABCA5ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 5
209993_atABCB1(MDR1)ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP), member 1
214033_atABCC6ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 6
210246_s_atABCC8ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 8
204567_s_atABCG1ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1
209735_atABCG2ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 2
204151_x_atAKR1C1aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C1 (dihydrodiol dehydrogenase 1; 20-alpha (3-alpha)-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase)
209699_x_atAKR1C2aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C2 (dihydrodiol dehydrogenase 2; bile acid binding protein; 3-alpha hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, type III)
212224_atALDH1A1aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1
204446_s_atALOX5arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase
205216_s_atAPOHapolipoprotein H (beta-2-glycoprotein I)
39248_atAQP3aquaporin 3 (Gill blood group)
218501_atARHGEF3Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 3
219087_atASPNAspirin
201242_s_atATP1B1ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, beta 1 polypeptide
200921_s_atBTG1B-cell translocation gene 1, anti-proliferative
228067_atC2orf55chromosome 2 open reading frame 55
206488_s_atCD36CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor)
208783_s_atCD46CD46 molecule, complement regulatory protein
1553970_s_atCELcarboxyl ester lipase (bile salt-stimulated lipase)
203854_atCFIcomplement factor I
205043_atCFTRcystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (ATP-binding cassette sub-family C, member 7)
204260_atCHGBchromogranin B (secretogranin 1)
221188_s_atCIDEBcell death-inducing DFFA-like effector b
203953_s_atCLDN3claudin 3
221042_s_atCLMNcalmin (calponin-like, transmembrane)
1567081_x_atCLN6ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 6, late infantile, variant
208791_atCLUClusterin
229831_atCNTN3contactin 3 (plasmacytoma associated)
205615_atCPA1carboxypeptidase A1 (pancreatic)
206212_atCPA2carboxypeptidase A2 (pancreatic)
205509_atCPB1carboxypeptidase B1 (tissue)
201117_s_atCPEcarboxypeptidase E
224829_atCPEB4cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 4
204920_atCPS1carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 1, mitochondrial
201990_s_atCREBL2cAMP responsive element binding protein-like 2
205971_s_atCTRB1 /// CTRB2chymotrypsinogen B1 /// chymotrypsinogen B2
214411_x_atCTRB2chymotrypsinogen B2
209774_x_atCXCL2chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2
205765_atCYP3A5cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 5
228391_atCYP4V2cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily V, polypeptide 2
228739_atCYS1cystin 1
222925_atDCDC2doublecortin domain containing 2
205311_atDDCdopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase)
210397_atDEFB1defensin, beta 1
221081_s_atDENND2DDENN/MADD domain containing 2D
214787_atDENND4ADENN/MADD domain containing 4A
205684_s_atDENND4CDENN/MADD domain containing 4C
214079_atDHRS2dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 2
222850_s_atDNAJB14DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 14
225415_atDTX3Ldeltex 3-like (Drosophila)
225645_atEHFEts homologous factor
210080_x_atELA3Aelastase 3A, pancreatic
201510_atELF3E74-like factor 3 (ets domain transcription factor, epithelial-specific)
206191_atENTPD3ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 3
220012_atERO1LBERO1-like beta (S. cerevisiae)
210103_s_atFOXA2forkhead box A2
235201_atFOXP2forkhead box P2
226847_atFSTFollistatin
205674_x_atFXYD2FXYD domain containing ion transport regulator 2
205890_s_atGABBR1 /// UBDgamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1 /// ubiquitin D
205848_atGAS2growth arrest-specific 2
216733_s_atGATMglycine amidinotransferase (L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase)
204965_atGCgroup-specific component (vitamin D binding protein)
219508_atGCNT3glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 3, mucin type
225853_atGNPNAT1glucosamine-phosphate N-acetyltransferase 1
212950_atGPR116G protein-coupled receptor 116
212070_atGPR56G protein-coupled receptor 56
203924_atGSTA1glutathione S-transferase A1
221942_s_atGUCY1A3guanylate cyclase 1, soluble, alpha 3
228697_atHINT3histidine triad nucleotide binding protein 3
209558_s_atHIP1Rhuntingtin interacting protein 1 related
207062_atIAPPislet amyloid polypeptide
213620_s_atICAM2intercellular adhesion molecule 2
203828_s_atIL32interleukin 32
205945_atIL6Rinterleukin 6 receptor
206598_atINSInsulin
226535_atITGB6integrin, beta 6
226189_atITGB8integrin, beta 8
210078_s_atKCNAB1potassium voltage-gated channel, shaker-related subfamily, beta member 1
219564_atKCNJ16potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 16
205303_atKCNJ8potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 8
212531_atLCN2lipocalin 2
235970_atLCORLligand dependent nuclear receptor corepressor-like
1554006_a_atLLGL2lethal giant larvae homolog 2 (Drosophila)
225996_atLONRF2LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 2
242931_atLONRF3LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 3
226748_atLYSMD2LysM, putative peptidoglycan-binding, domain containing 2
213975_s_atLYZlysozyme (renal amyloidosis)
222670_s_atMAFBv-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B (avian)
223577_x_atMALAT1metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (non-protein coding)
220945_x_atMANSC1MANSC domain containing 1
204388_s_atMAOAmonoamine oxidase A
235077_atMEG3maternally expressed 3
229254_atMFSD4major facilitator superfamily domain containing 4
219797_atMGAT4Amannosyl (alpha-1,3-)-glycoprotein beta-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, isozyme A
204259_atMMP7matrix metallopeptidase 7 (matrilysin, uterine)
227747_atMPZL3myelin protein zero-like 3
204438_atMRC1 /// MRC1L1mannose receptor, C type 1 /// mannose receptor, C type 1-like 1
203037_s_atMTSS1metastasis suppressor 1
212093_s_atMTUS1mitochondrial tumor suppressor 1
213693_s_atMUC1mucin 1, cell surface associated
213375_s_atN4BP2L1NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1
220184_atNANOGNanog homeobox
209107_x_atNCOA1nuclear receptor coactivator 1
1556057_s_atNEUROD1neurogenic differentiation 1
206915_atNKX2-2NK2 homeobox 2
225911_atNPNTNephronectin
205259_atNR3C2nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 2
212768_s_atOLFM4olfactomedin 4
203845_atPCAFp300/CBP-associated factor
240317_atPCDHB4protocadherin beta 4
212593_s_atPDCD4programmed cell death 4 (neoplastic transformation inhibitor)
213228_atPDE8Bphosphodiesterase 8B
225207_atPDK4pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 4
205380_atPDZK1PDZ domain containing 1
1553589_a_atPDZK1IP1PDZK1 interacting protein 1
226459_atPIK3AP1phosphoinositide-3-kinase adaptor protein 1
220954_s_atPILRBpaired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor beta
219584_atPLA1Aphospholipase A1 member A
206311_s_atPLA2G1Bphospholipase A2, group IB (pancreas)
221529_s_atPLVAPplasmalemma vesicle associated protein
205912_atPNLIPpancreatic lipase
211766_s_atPNLIPRP2pancreatic lipase-related protein 2
208286_x_atPOU5F1(Oct4)POU class 5 homeobox 1 /// POU class 5 homeobox 1B /// POU class 5 homeobox 1 pseudogene 3 /// POU class 5 homeobox 1 pseudogene 4
228469_atPPIDPeptidylprolyl isomerase D (cyclophilin D)
210670_atPPYpancreatic polypeptide
242482_atPRKAR1Aprotein kinase, cAMP-dependent, regulatory, type I, alpha (tissue specific extinguisher 1)
227629_atPRLRProlactin receptor
228656_atPROX1prospero homeobox 1
205869_atPRSS1protease, serine, 1 (trypsin 1)
205402_x_atPRSS2protease, serine, 2 (trypsin 2)
213421_x_atPRSS3protease, serine, 3
203317_atPSD4pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 4
203029_s_atPTPRN2protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, N polypeptide 2
219562_atRAB26RAB26, member RAS oncogene family
226436_atRASSF4Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 4
223322_atRASSF5Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 5
235638_atRASSF6Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 6
204364_s_atREEP1receptor accessory protein 1
209752_atREG1Aregenerating islet-derived 1 alpha (pancreatic stone protein, pancreatic thread protein)
205886_atREG1Bregenerating islet-derived 1 beta (pancreatic stone protein, pancreatic thread protein)
205815_atREG3Aregenerating islet-derived 3 alpha
1554003_atRGNEFRho-guanine nucleotide exchange factor
219263_atRNF128ring finger protein 128
221614_s_atRPH3ALrabphilin 3A-like (without C2 domains)
213939_s_atRUFY3RUN and FYVE domain containing 3
210592_s_atSAT1spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase 1
203408_s_atSATB1SATB homeobox 1
204035_atSCG2secretogranin II (chromogranin C)
205697_atSCGNsecretagogin, EF-hand calcium binding protein
229620_atSEPP1Selenoprotein P, plasma, 1
202833_s_atSERPINA1serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 1
202376_atSERPINA3serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 3
209443_atSERPINA5serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 5
213572_s_atSERPINB1serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 1
227627_atSGK3serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase family, member 3
219256_s_atSH3TC1SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeats 1
204019_s_atSH3YL1SH3 domain containing, Ysc84-like 1 (S. cerevisiae)
213464_atSHC2SHC (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 2
205799_s_atSLC3A1solute carrier family 3 (cystine, dibasic and neutral amino acid transporters, activator of cystine, dibasic and neutral amino acid transport), member 1
223044_atSLC40A1solute carrier family 40 (iron-regulated transporter), member 1
228221_atSLC44A3solute carrier family 44, member 3
213139_atSNAI2(Slug)snail homolog 2 (Drosophila)
1560228_atSNAI3(Snail)snail homolog 3 (Drosophila)
213721_atSOX2SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2
200795_atSPARCL1SPARC-like 1 (mast9, hevin)
206239_s_atSPINK1serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 1
213921_atSSTsomatostatin
216905_s_atST14suppression of tumorigenicity 14 (colon carcinoma)
230285_atSVIPsmall VCP/p97-interacting protein
227134_atSYTL1synaptotagmin-like 1
202286_s_atTACSTD2tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2
205513_atTCN1transcobalamin I (vitamin B12 binding protein, R binder family)
203887_s_atTHBDthrombomodulin
209937_atTM4SF4transmembrane 4 L six family member 4
226403_atTMC4transmembrane channel-like 4
223503_atTMEM163transmembrane protein 163
218345_atTMEM176Atransmembrane protein 176A
220532_s_atTMEM176Btransmembrane protein 176B
200847_s_atTMEM66transmembrane protein 66
202687_s_atTNFSF10tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 10
203824_atTSPAN8tetraspanin 8
229169_atTTC18tetratricopeptide repeat domain 18
209660_atTTRtransthyretin (prealbumin, amyloidosis type I)
231008_atUNC5CLUnc-5 homolog C (C. elegans)-like
226344_atZMAT1zinc finger, matrin type 1
206059_atZNF91zinc finger protein 91

3.5. Elevation of In Vivo Tumor Growth, Metastatic Activity, and Radioresistance in HNSCC-ALDH1− Cells by Overexpression of Bmi-1

We next sought to determine if Bmi-1 expression could modulate the in vivo tumor initiating activity in immunocompromised nude mice. To monitor the in vivo growth of ALDH1+, ALDH1−, and Bmi-1-overexpressing ALDH1− cells, these cells were transfected using a lentivector combined with the green fluorescent protein gene (GFP) and followed by in vivo GFP imaging system. Firstly, the results showed that 1 × 104ALDH1− cells did not induce tumor formation in nude mice, but 1000 ALDH1+ cells generated visible tumors 6 weeks after injection (Table 1). In contrast to ALDH1− cells, one of three (33.3%) nude mice was detected with the tumor formation after 6-week transplantation of 3000 Bmi-1-overexpressing ALDH1− cells. Furthermore, tumor volumes in HNSCC-ALDH1+ transplanted mice were significantly decreased when mice were treated with sh-Bmi-1 (Table 1; Figure 4(a)). Overexpression of Bmi-1 enhanced in vivo tumor growth in HNSCC-ALDH1− (Table 1; Figure 4(a)). Furthermore, we investigated the role of Bmi-1 in the radio sensitivity of HNSCC-ALDH1− and HNSCC-ALDH1+ treated with sh-Bmi-1 and Bmi-1 overexpressing. An ionizing radiation (IR) dose of 0 to 10 Gy was applied to these cells, and HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells showed greater radioresistance than the ALDH1− cells (P < .05; Figure 4(b)). Knockdown of BMI-1 in ALDH1+ cells results in significant inhibition of radioresistance while overexpression of BMI-1 in ALDH- cells promotes radioresistant properties (P < .05; Figure 4(b)). Moreover, to confirm that Bmi-1 is crucial for metastasis in vivo, mice were injected with different numbers of ALDH1+, ALDH1+/sh-Bmi-1, ALDH1−/Bmi-1over or control GFP-expressing ALDH1− cells. 5x105 Bmi-1-overexpressing ALDH1− cells significantly increased local invasion, distant metastasis to the lungs and tumor size compared with control ALDH1− cells (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). In addition, silencing Bmi-1 in ALDH1+ cells effectively reduced the number of lung metastases and tumor size in vivo (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Taken together, our results reveal a crucial role for Bmi-1 signaling in the maintenance of in vivo tumorigenicity and metastasis of HNSCC-ALDH1+ and -ALDH1− cells.
Figure 4

Determination of the role of Bmi-1 on in vivo tumor growth and radioresistance in HNSCC-ALDH1+cells. (a) Tumor volume was measured after injection of either HNSCC-ALDH1+, sh-Bmi-1 treated HNSCC-ALDH1+, HNSCC-ALDH1, or Bmi-1-overexpressing HNSCC- ALDH1 cells into the neck of SCID mice. Error bars correspond to SD. (b) To determine the radiation effect on the cell survival rate, an ionizing radiation (IR) dose from 0 to 10Gy was used to treated with ALDH1+/vector, ALDH1+/sh-Bmi-1, ALDH1 /vector, or Bmi-1-overexpressing HNSCC- ALDH1 HNSCC cells.

Figure 5

Elimination of metastatic activity in HNSCC-ALDH1+cells treated with shBmi-1. (a) Summary of the in vivo metastasis ability of different numbers of HNSCC-ALDH1+, sh-Bmi-1 treated HNSCC-ALDH1+, HNSCC- ALDH1, or Bmi-1-overexpressing HNSCC- ALDH1 cells examined by xenotransplantation analysis. (b) The average numbers of metastatic foci (left panel) and total weight (right panel) in the lungs of mice treated with either HNSCC-ALDH1+, sh-Bmi-1 treated HNSCC-ALDH1+, HNSCC- ALDH1, or Bmi-1-overexpressing HNSCC-ALDH1cells are shown. (*P < .05: ALDH1− versus Bmi-1-overexpressing ALDH1−; # P < .05: ALDH1+ versus shBmi-1 treated HNSCC-ALDH1+).

3.6. Coexpression of Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 in HNSCC Tissues Correlates with Poor Overall Survival Rate of HNSCC Patients

Elevated Snail protein expression in HNSCC is correlated with the development of metastasis and poor survival [37]. Elevated expression of ALDH1 also correlates with poor prognosis for HNSCC patients [13]. To investigate whether there is a positive correlation between Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 in head and neck cancers, we studied the expression of Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of a panel of specimens array from 93 HNSCC patients. The IHC results showed that elevated expression of Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 was positively associated with high-grade, poorly differentiated HNSCC (Figure 6(a)). Our results also showed a significant positive correlation between ALDH-1, Bmi-1 (Figure 6(b)); ALDH-1 and Snail (Figure 6(c)); Bmi-1 and Snail (Figure 6(d)) in HNSCC tissues. This is consistent with previous studies that reported that HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells have elevated Bmi-1 and Snail expression [13, 38]. To determine the prognostic significance of Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 coexpression in patients with HNSCC, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Patients who were triple positive for Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 were predicted to have the worst survival rate compared with other head and neck cancer patients (Figure 6(e); Bmi-1+/Snail+/ALDH1+ versus other groups). Overall, these data indicate that expression of Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 in HNSCC patients could be a critical factor in predicting disease progression and clinical outcomes.
Figure 6

Coexpression of Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 in HNSCC patient specimen and prediction of survival of the HNSCC patients. (a) Representative pictures of triple positive (upper panel) and triple negative (lower panel) HNSCC cases. Coexpression of Bmi-1 and ALDH1 (b), Bmi-1 and Snail (c) or Snail and Bmi-1 (d) of 93 HNSCC patient samples were examined immunohistochemically. (e) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival of HNSCC patients according to expression of ALDH1 (+) Bmi-1 (+) Snail (+), ALDH1 (+) Bmi-1 (+) Snail (−), ALDH1 (−) Bmi-1 (+) Snail (+) or ALDH1 (−) Bmi-1 (−) Snail (−). (*, P < .05; **, P < .01; ***, P < .001).

4. Discussion

A recent study demonstrated that Bmi-1 mRNA and protein overexpressed in a subpopulation of tumor initiating cells in CD44+ HNSCC, which possessed self-renewal and tumor formation ability [39]. Zhang et al. also reported that there are side populations of oral squamous cell carcinomas that express high levels of ABCG2, ABCB1, CD44, Oct-4, Bmi-1, NSPc1, and CK19 [28]. Our previous work showed that HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells have high levels of Bmi-1. The ability to self-renew and radiochemoresistance were significantly suppressed in Bmi-1-silenced HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells [38]. Using microarray, western-blotting, and immunofluorescent assays, Chen et al. confirmed that ALDH1+-lineage cells underwent epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and endogenously co-expressed Snail [13]. In the current study, our data demonstrated that HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells had high levels of Bmi-1, at both the mRNA and protein levels (Figure 2). Using a lentiviral vector expressing shRNA targeting Bmi-1, we observed that the level of ALDH1 expression and tumorigenic properties of HNSCC-ALDH1+ could be down-regulated by knockdown of Bmi-1 (Figure 2). Importantly, overexpression of Bmi-1 could turn HNSCC-ALDH1− into cancer stem cell-like HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells (Figure 3). Consistent with these findings, the immunohistochemical survey of 93 HNSCC patient tissues showed a positive correlation between expression of Bmi-1, Snail, or ALDH1 and tumor stage (Figure 6). Similar results were noted in other malignancies [40]. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients expressing Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 were predicted to have the worst survival prognosis of HNSCC patients (Figure 6(e)). However, a recent study showed a significant correlation between negative Bmi-1 protein expression and the recurrence of tongue cancer. Their results showed Snail and c-myc expression did not correlate with prognosis [41]. The divergence from our results may be due to the different pathophysiology of HNSCC. Most HNSCC patients in Taiwan consume alcohol, chew betel quid and smoke cigarettes. Tongue cancer patients, especially female tongue cancer patients, usually do not have these habits [3]. The close relationship between tongue cancer and human papillomavirus has been explored by many researchers [42-45]. The correlation between cancer stem cells and the virus infection remains to be discovered. The prognosis of HNSCC patients with distant metastases in the lung, liver, and bone is very poor [3, 46]. In this study, we found that Bmi-1 can regulate Snail and ALDH1; change the EMT-related genotypes of the ALDH1− cells; and modulate distant lung metastases (Figure 5). Distant metastases have been reported to be associated with Bmi-1 expression in breast cancer [47-49], melanoma [50], gastric cancer [51], and colon cancer [30]. Microarray analysis revealed that eleven gene signatures, which were correlated to the Bmi-1-driven pathway, were closely related to distant lung metastases [40]. Bmi-1 is the target gene of SALL4 in human hematopoietic as well as leukemic cells and is down-regulated if SALL4 is knocked down by the siRNA in the HL-60 leukemia cell line [52, 53]. Recently, researchers employed microRNA profiling to gain insight into the role of Bmi-1 in regulating EMT. Overexpression of miR-200c decreased Bmi-1 expression in breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) and inhibited the formation of mammary ducts as well as tumors by normal mammary stem cells and BCSCs [54]. Bhattacharya et al. found that miR-15a and miR-16 directly targeted the Bmi-1 3′ untranslated region and correlated with Bmi-1 protein levels in ovarian cancer patients and cell lines [55]. Further research effort is needed in this area. Together, our research shows that the Bmi-1 signaling pathways play a major role in the maintenance of stemness and the metastatic ability of HNSCC-CSC by regulating of Snail expression. Additionally, we demonstrate coexpression of Bmi-1, Snail, and ALDH1 in HNSCC patients was positively correlated with tumor grade and the worst prognosis. Figure 1. (a) Cell morphology in ALDH1+ HNSCC cells under specific serum free medium and 10% serum (right panel). Epithelial differentiation marker, CK18 positive cells in ALDH1+ HNSCC cells under specific serum free medium and 10% serum (right panel). (b) In vivo self-renewal ability of HNSCC-ALDH1+ cells. Click here for additional data file.
  54 in total

1.  Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation.

Authors:  Anna V Molofsky; Ricardo Pardal; Toshihide Iwashita; In-Kyung Park; Michael F Clarke; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells.

Authors:  Eugenio Sangiorgi; Mario R Capecchi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-06-08       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Recent advances in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Robert I Haddad; Dong M Shin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Downregulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells.

Authors:  Yohei Shimono; Maider Zabala; Robert W Cho; Neethan Lobo; Piero Dalerba; Dalong Qian; Maximilian Diehn; Huiping Liu; Sarita P Panula; Eric Chiao; Frederick M Dirbas; George Somlo; Renee A Reijo Pera; Kaiqin Lao; Michael F Clarke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Bmi-1 is related to proliferation, survival and poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wenjie Song; Kaishan Tao; Haimin Li; Chen Jin; Zhenshun Song; Jun Li; Hai Shi; Xiao Li; Zheng Dang; Kefeng Dou
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  Microarray analysis identifies a death-from-cancer signature predicting therapy failure in patients with multiple types of cancer.

Authors:  Gennadi V Glinsky; Olga Berezovska; Anna B Glinskii
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a putative marker for cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Chih Chen; Yi-Wei Chen; Han-Shui Hsu; Ling-Ming Tseng; Pin-I Huang; Kai-Hsi Lu; Dow-Tien Chen; Lung-Kuo Tai; Ming-Chi Yung; Shih-Ching Chang; Hung-Hai Ku; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Wen-Liang Lo
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Prevalence and significance of human papillomavirus in oral tongue cancer: the Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Xin-Hua Liang; Jason Lewis; Robert Foote; David Smith; Deepak Kademani
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Independent prognostic value of the basal-like phenotype of breast cancer and associations with EGFR and candidate stem cell marker BMI-1.

Authors:  J B Arnes; K Collett; L A Akslen
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  BMI1 cooperates with H-RAS to induce an aggressive breast cancer phenotype with brain metastases.

Authors:  M J Hoenerhoff; I Chu; D Barkan; Z-y Liu; S Datta; G P Dimri; J E Green
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  52 in total

1.  Cancer stem cells: mediators of tumorigenesis and metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Steven B Chinn; Owen A Darr; John H Owen; Emily Bellile; Jonathan B McHugh; Matthew E Spector; Silvana M Papagerakis; Douglas B Chepeha; Carol R Bradford; Thomas E Carey; Mark E P Prince
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Comparison of quantum dot technology with conventional immunohistochemistry in examining aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 as a potential biomarker for lymph node metastasis of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Susan Müller; Sreenivas Nannapaneni; Lin Pan; Yuxiang Wang; Xianghong Peng; Dongsheng Wang; Mourad Tighiouart; Zhengjia Chen; Nabil F Saba; Jonathan J Beitler; Dong M Shin; Zhuo Georgia Chen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  The relationship between Bmi-1 and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Huang; Yuan Qiu; Guoqin Chen; Liyan Huang; Jianxing He
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  High peritumoral Bmi-1 expression is an independent prognosticator of poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qilai Long; Li Liu; Yu Xia; Qi Bai; Jiajun Wang; Jiejie Xu; Jianming Guo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  Inverse association between Bmi-1 and RKIP affecting clinical outcome of gastric cancer and revealing the potential molecular mechanisms underlying tumor metastasis and chemotherapy resistance.

Authors:  Yinting Chen; Guoda Lian; Guangsheng Ou; Kege Yang; Jianning Chen; Haigang Li; Shaojie Chen; Jiajia Li; Linjuan Zeng; Kaihong Huang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Expression of Cancer Stem Cell Biomarkers in Human Head and Neck Carcinomas: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Raissa Borges Curtarelli; Jussara Maria Gonçalves; Luciane Geanini Pena Dos Santos; Maria Gorete Savi; Jacques Eduardo Nör; Luis André Mendonça Mezzomo; Mabel Mariela Rodríguez Cordeiro
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 7.  Intratumoral heterogeneity: Clonal cooperation in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis.

Authors:  Deepika Neelakantan; David J Drasin; Heide L Ford
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Cell plasticity and heterogeneity in cancer.

Authors:  Nemanja D Marjanovic; Robert A Weinberg; Christine L Chaffer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 9.  The role of NANOG transcriptional factor in the development of malignant phenotype of cancer cells.

Authors:  Natalia Gawlik-Rzemieniewska; Ilona Bednarek
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 10.  Targeting Head and Neck Cancer Stem Cells: Current Advances and Future Challenges.

Authors:  A C Birkeland; J H Owen; M E Prince
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.