Literature DB >> 20935586

Study of Theories about Myopia Progression (STAMP) design and baseline data.

David A Berntsen1, Donald O Mutti, Karla Zadnik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Study of Theories about Myopia Progression (STAMP) is a 2-year, double-masked, randomized clinical trial of myopic children 6 to 11 years of age. STAMP will evaluate the 1-year effect of progressive addition lenses (PALs) compared with single vision lenses (SVLs) on central refraction, peripheral refraction in four quadrants, and accommodative response and convergence. STAMP will also evaluate any changes 1 year after discontinuing PALs. Baseline characteristics of enrolled children are reported.
METHODS: Eligible children had a high accommodative lag and either low myopia (less myopic than -2.25 diopter (D) spherical equivalent) or high myopia (more myopic than -2.25 D spherical equivalent) and esophoria at near. Children were randomly assigned to wear either PALs or SVLs for 1 year to determine the difference in myopia progression in the PAL group relative to the SVL group. All children will then wear SVLs for the 2nd year to evaluate the permanence of any treatment effect. Complete ocular biometric data are collected at 6-month intervals.
RESULTS: Over 17 months, 192 children were screened, and 85 (44%) were eligible and enrolled. Of these 85 children, 44 (52%) were girls, and 54 (64%) were esophoric at near. The mean age (± SD) was 9.8 ± 1.3 years. The right eye mean cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was -1.95 ± 0.78 D. Horizontal relative peripheral hyperopia (30° nasal retina + 0.56 ± 0.59 D; 30° temporal retina + 0.61 ± 0.77 D) and vertical relative peripheral myopia (30° superior retina -0.36 ± 0.92 D; 20° inferior retina -0.48 ± 0.83 D) were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The baseline data for STAMP are reported. Asymmetry between vertical and horizontal meridian relative peripheral refraction was found. STAMP will use the ocular biometric changes associated with the PAL treatment effect to attempt to elucidate the mechanism responsible for the treatment effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20935586      PMCID: PMC3075061          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181f6f776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  68 in total

1.  Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia.

Authors:  W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children.

Authors:  D O Mutti; L A Jones; M L Moeschberger; K Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Reliability and validity of the partial coherence interferometry for measurement of ocular axial length in children.

Authors:  H M Hussin; P G D Spry; M A Majid; P Gouws
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.

Authors:  Yee-Fong Choong; Ai-Hong Chen; Pik-Pin Goh
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004.

Authors:  Susan Vitale; Robert D Sperduto; Frederick L Ferris
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12

6.  Effectiveness of hyperopic defocus, minimal defocus, or myopic defocus in competition with a myopiagenic stimulus in tree shrew eyes.

Authors:  Thomas T Norton; John T Siegwart; Angela O Amedo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Effects of optical defocus on refractive development in monkeys: evidence for local, regionally selective mechanisms.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Juan Huang; Terry L Blasdel; Tammy L Humbird; Kurt H Bockhorst
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children.

Authors:  D O Mutti; R I Sholtz; N E Friedman; K Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Peripheral defocus with single-vision spectacle lenses in myopic children.

Authors:  Zhi Lin; Aldo Martinez; Xiang Chen; Li Li; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Brien A Holden; Jian Ge
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Nicole Quinn; Kayla Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  Time outdoors, visual activity, and myopia progression in juvenile-onset myopes.

Authors:  Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Loraine T Sinnott; Susan A Cotter; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Three-dimensional MRI study of the relationship between eye dimensions, retinal shape and myopia.

Authors:  James M Pope; Pavan K Verkicharla; Farshid Sepehrband; Marwan Suheimat; Katrina L Schmid; David A Atchison
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  The effect of bifocal add on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Peripheral defocus and myopia progression in myopic children randomly assigned to wear single vision and progressive addition lenses.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Christopher D Barr; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Accommodation response and spherical aberration during orthokeratology.

Authors:  L Batres; S Peruzzo; M Serramito; G Carracedo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Myopia onset and progression: can it be prevented?

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Francesco Semeraro; Mario R Romano; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Roberto Dell'Omo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Juvenile myopia progression, risk factors and interventions.

Authors:  Elliott H Myrowitz
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-15

10.  Does peripheral retinal input explain the promising myopia control effects of corneal reshaping therapy (CRT or ortho-K) & multifocal soft contact lenses?

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Melanie C W Campbell; Elizabeth Irving
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.