PURPOSE: To assess the validity and repeatability of partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster) and A-scan ultrasound measurement of axial length (AL) in children. METHODS: A prospective comparison of AL measurement made by the IOLMaster optical instrument (Carl Zeiss) and ultrasound A-scan (Alcon) was performed. A total of 20 children (11 male, nine female) were recruited into the study; the mean age of the sample was 11.4 years (range 6.2-15.8). Inclusion criteria comprised individuals <16 years, with no ocular pathology and no previous eye operations or allergy to topical anaesthetics. All measurements were performed by a single examiner. RESULTS: Data on validity show that, on average, a small measurement difference existed between these groups with the IOLMaster being 0.017 mm greater than A-scan ultrasonography. The 95% confidence interval for this difference encompasses zero, demonstrating that no significant systematic bias exists between the two-measurement techniques. Overall, IOLMaster reliability exceeded that of A-scan. This is evidenced primarily by the spread of the paired test-retest difference for A-scan compared to IOLMaster. The mean test-retest difference for A-scan was considerably larger than IOLMaster at 0.042 and 0.004 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results show that IOLMaster was more accurate and reproducible than the contact ultrasonographic technique when used in children. Such results indicate that IOLMaster may be a useful tool in studies of eye growth and refractive development in children.
PURPOSE: To assess the validity and repeatability of partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster) and A-scan ultrasound measurement of axial length (AL) in children. METHODS: A prospective comparison of AL measurement made by the IOLMaster optical instrument (Carl Zeiss) and ultrasound A-scan (Alcon) was performed. A total of 20 children (11 male, nine female) were recruited into the study; the mean age of the sample was 11.4 years (range 6.2-15.8). Inclusion criteria comprised individuals <16 years, with no ocular pathology and no previous eye operations or allergy to topical anaesthetics. All measurements were performed by a single examiner. RESULTS: Data on validity show that, on average, a small measurement difference existed between these groups with the IOLMaster being 0.017 mm greater than A-scan ultrasonography. The 95% confidence interval for this difference encompasses zero, demonstrating that no significant systematic bias exists between the two-measurement techniques. Overall, IOLMaster reliability exceeded that of A-scan. This is evidenced primarily by the spread of the paired test-retest difference for A-scan compared to IOLMaster. The mean test-retest difference for A-scan was considerably larger than IOLMaster at 0.042 and 0.004 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results show that IOLMaster was more accurate and reproducible than the contact ultrasonographic technique when used in children. Such results indicate that IOLMaster may be a useful tool in studies of eye growth and refractive development in children.