Literature DB >> 20688729

The effect of bifocal add on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag.

David A Berntsen1, Donald O Mutti, Karla Zadnik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a bifocal add and manifest correction on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag, who have been reported to have the greatest reduction in myopia progression with progressive addition lenses (PALs).
METHODS: Monocular accommodative lag to a 4-D Badal stimulus was measured on two occasions 6 months apart in 83 children (mean ± SD age, 9.9 ± 1.3 years) with high lag randomized to wearing single-vision lenses (SVLs) or PALs. Accommodative lag was measured with the following corrections: habitual, manifest, manifest with +2.00-D add, and habitual with +2.00-D add (6-month visit only).
RESULTS: At baseline, accommodative lag was higher (1.72 ± 0.37 D; mean ± SD) when measured with manifest correction than with habitual correction (1.51 ± 0.50; P < 0.05). This higher lag with manifest correction correlated with a larger amount of habitual undercorrection at baseline (r = -0.29, P = 0.009). A +2.00-D add over the manifest correction reduced lag by 0.45 ± 0.34 D at baseline and 0.33 ± 0.38 D at the 6-month visit. Lag results at 6 months were not different between PAL and SVL wearers (P = 0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: A +2.00-D bifocal add did not eliminate accommodative lag and reduced lag by less than 25% of the bifocal power, indicating that children mainly responded to a bifocal by decreasing accommodation. If myopic progression is substantial, measuring lag with full correction can overestimate the hyperopic retinal blur that a child most recently experienced. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00335049.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688729      PMCID: PMC3055747          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  38 in total

1.  Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia.

Authors:  W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response.

Authors:  M Rosenfield; M F Carrel
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2001-01

3.  Compensatory changes in eye growth and refraction induced by daily wear of soft contact lenses in young marmosets.

Authors:  A R Whatham; S J Judge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction.

Authors:  Anne Seidemann; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Free-space accommodative response and minus lens-induced accommodative response in pre-school children.

Authors:  A H Chen; D J O'Leary
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2000-07

6.  Optimal dioptric value of near addition lenses intended to slow myopic progression.

Authors:  Bai-chuan Jiang; Steve Bussa; Yin C Tea; Kenneth Seger
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  The Hong Kong progressive lens myopia control study: study design and main findings.

Authors:  Marion Hastings Edwards; Roger Wing-Hong Li; Carly Siu-Yin Lam; John Kwok-Fai Lew; Bibianna Sin-Ying Yu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  A randomized clinical trial of bifocal glasses for myopic children with esophoria: results after 54 months.

Authors:  George W Fulk; Lynn A Cyert; Donald E Parker
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2002-08

9.  Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children.

Authors:  Jane E Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Thomas T Norton; Mohamed E M Hussein; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Ruth Manny; Ying Wang; Donald Everett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Mohamed Hussein; Donald Everett; Thomas T Norton; Daniel Kurtz; M Cristina Leske; Ruth Manny; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Mitch Scheiman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Optical treatment strategies to slow myopia progression: effects of the visual extent of the optical treatment zone.

Authors:  Earl L Smith
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Prentice Award Lecture 2010: A case for peripheral optical treatment strategies for myopia.

Authors:  Earl L Smith
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Epidemiology, genetics and treatments for myopia.

Authors:  Lei Yu; Zhi-Kui Li; Jin-Rong Gao; Jian-Rong Liu; Chang-Tai Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Genetically low vitamin D concentrations and myopic refractive error: a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Katie M Williams; Seyhan Yazar; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Alex W Hewitt; Cathy Williams; Jie Jin Wang; Pik-Fang Kho; Seang Mei Saw; Ching-Yu Cheng; Tien Yin Wong; Tin Aung; Terri L Young; J Willem L Tideman; Jost B Jonas; Paul Mitchell; Robert Wojciechowski; Dwight Stambolian; Pirro Hysi; Christopher J Hammond; David A Mackey; Robyn M Lucas; Stuart MacGregor
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina B Lindsley; S Swaroop Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; Sueko M Ng; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-13

8.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level is associated with myopia in the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Kwon; Jin A Choi; Tae Yoon La
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Correction of Low-Moderate Hyperopia Improves Accommodative Function for Some Hyperopic Children During Sustained Near Work.

Authors:  Michael Ntodie; Kathryn J Saunders; Julie-Anne Little
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Effect of Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments Spectacle Lens Wear on Visual Function in Myopic Chinese Children.

Authors:  Carly Siu Yin Lam; Wing Chun Tang; Hua Qi; Hema Radhakrishnan; Keigo Hasegawa; Chi Ho To; W Neil Charman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.