Literature DB >> 20931305

The potential of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in patients with an elevated serum PSA level.

Ryogo Minamimoto1, Hiroji Uemura, Futoshi Sano, Hideyuki Terao, Yoji Nagashima, Shoji Yamanaka, Kazuya Shizukuishi, Ukihide Tateishi, Yoshinobu Kubota, Tomio Inoue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential and limitation of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in subjects with an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Although [¹⁸F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has limited value in detecting prostate cancer, the potential of PET/CT has not been precisely evaluated, since positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) provides accurate localization of functional findings obtained by PET.
METHODS: Subjects with an increasing PSA level suggestive of prostate cancer were enrolled in this study. FDG-PET/CT was performed prior to prostate biopsy and the findings were compared with the pathological results.
RESULTS: Fifty subjects with an elevated serum PSA level took part in this study. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of FDG-PET/CT in the prostate were 51.9% (27/52 areas), 75.7% (112/148 areas) and 42.9% (27/63 areas), respectively; those in the peripheral zone were 73.3% (22/30 areas), 64.3% (45/70 areas) and 46.8% (22/47 areas), respectively; and those in the central gland were 22.7% (5/22 areas), 85.9% (67/78 areas) and 31.3% (5/16 areas), respectively. The estimated cut-off values according to the highest odds ratio (OR) were age of 70 years [OR: 7.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-25.93] and a PSA value of 12.0 ng/ml (OR: 10.77, 95% CI: 2.78-41.74). The FDG-PET/CT could potentially detect cancer with 80.0% sensitivity and 87.0% PPV in cases with a Gleason score of 7 or greater.
CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT was appropriate for detecting peripheral zone prostate cancer in patients at more than an intermediate risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20931305     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-010-0424-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  33 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Multicentre study of 18F-FDG-PET/CT prostate incidental uptake.

Authors:  Francesco Bertagna; Arnoldo Piccardo; Bassam Dib; Mattia Bertoli; Federica Fracassi; Giovanni Bosio; Raffaele Giubbini; Giorgio Biasiotto; Luca Giovanella; Giorgio Treglia
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Jeremy C Durack; Serge K Lyashchenko; Sarah M Cheal; Volkan Beylergil; Robert A Lefkowitz; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Danny F Martinez; Alex Mak Fung; Stephen B Solomon; Mithat Gönen; Glenn Heller; Massimo Loda; David M Nanus; Scott T Tagawa; Jarett L Feldman; Joseph R Osborne; Jason S Lewis; Victor E Reuter; Wolfgang A Weber; Neil H Bander; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson; Michael J Morris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Is prostate cancer stage migration continuing for black men in the PSA era?

Authors:  R W Dobbs; D T Greenwald; H Wadhwa; V L Freeman; M R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  Imaging of prostate cancer with PET/CT using (18)F-Fluorocholine.

Authors:  Reza Vali; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Werner Langesteger; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 6.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Is There Use for FDG-PET in Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 8.  Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.