BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In-stent restenosis (ISR) after angioplasty/stenting for intracranial stenosis has been reported in up to 25% to 30% of patients. Detection and monitoring of ISR relies primarily on serial catheter angiography, because noninvasive imaging methods are typically hampered by stent-related artifact. We examined the value of serial vessel flow measurements using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (QMRA) in detection of ISR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records of patients undergoing stenting for intracranial symptomatic stenosis >50% between 2005 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Angiographic images were graded by a blinded neurointerventionalist for stenosis pretreatment, immediately after treatment, and during follow-up. Flow in the affected vessel measured by QMRA was recorded; > 25% reduction in flow was considered indicative of an adverse change. Clinical data regarding neurological outcome were also collected. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent stenting during the time interval studied. Of these, 12 patients (mean age, 55.5 years; 8 female) had contemporaneous angiography and QMRA and were analyzed. Median follow-up was 9 months. Six patients (50%) demonstrated angiographic restenosis 2 to 12 months after treatment; all had an analogous decrease in flow in the vessel of interest. Of 3 patients with more severe flow decrement (> 50%), 2 experienced stroke. None of the patients without angiographic ISR demonstrated a flow decrease on QMRA. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary series, flow decrease on QMRA is highly predictive of angiographic ISR. Additionally, the degree of flow decrement correlates with symptomatic ISR. QMRA may provide a useful noninvasive tool for serial monitoring after intracranial stenting.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In-stent restenosis (ISR) after angioplasty/stenting for intracranial stenosis has been reported in up to 25% to 30% of patients. Detection and monitoring of ISR relies primarily on serial catheter angiography, because noninvasive imaging methods are typically hampered by stent-related artifact. We examined the value of serial vessel flow measurements using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (QMRA) in detection of ISR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records of patients undergoing stenting for intracranial symptomatic stenosis >50% between 2005 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Angiographic images were graded by a blinded neurointerventionalist for stenosis pretreatment, immediately after treatment, and during follow-up. Flow in the affected vessel measured by QMRA was recorded; > 25% reduction in flow was considered indicative of an adverse change. Clinical data regarding neurological outcome were also collected. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent stenting during the time interval studied. Of these, 12 patients (mean age, 55.5 years; 8 female) had contemporaneous angiography and QMRA and were analyzed. Median follow-up was 9 months. Six patients (50%) demonstrated angiographic restenosis 2 to 12 months after treatment; all had an analogous decrease in flow in the vessel of interest. Of 3 patients with more severe flow decrement (> 50%), 2 experienced stroke. None of the patients without angiographic ISR demonstrated a flow decrease on QMRA. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary series, flow decrease on QMRA is highly predictive of angiographic ISR. Additionally, the degree of flow decrement correlates with symptomatic ISR. QMRA may provide a useful noninvasive tool for serial monitoring after intracranial stenting.
Authors: Daniel M Birk; Matthew K Tobin; Heather E Moss; Eric Feinstein; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Xinjian Du; Dilip K Pandey; Keith R Thulborn; Fady T Charbel Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Sophia F Shakur; Victor A Aletich; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Ahmed E Hussein; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Darian R Esfahani; Matthew Stevenson; Heather E Moss; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Victor Aletich; Sachin Jain; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: C Wu; S Schnell; P Vakil; A R Honarmand; S A Ansari; J Carr; M Markl; S Prabhakaran Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.350