Literature DB >> 25860429

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Venography is Correlated With Intravenous Pressures Before and After Venous Sinus Stenting: Implications for Treatment and Monitoring.

Darian R Esfahani1, Matthew Stevenson, Heather E Moss, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Victor Aletich, Sachin Jain, Fady T Charbel, Ali Alaraj.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endovascular stenting is an effective treatment for patients with clinically significant cerebral venous sinus stenosis. Traditionally, stenting is indicated in elevated intravenous pressures on conventional venography; however, noninvasive monitoring is more desirable. Quantitative magnetic resonance angiography is an imaging modality that measures blood flow noninvasively. Established in the arterial system, applications to the venous sinuses have been limited.
OBJECTIVE: To examine quantitative magnetic resonance venography (qMRV) in the measurement of venous sinus flow in patients undergoing endovascular stenting and to identify a relationship with intravenous pressures.
METHODS: Five patients with intracranial hypertension secondary to venous sinus stenosis underwent cerebral venous stenting between 2009 and 2013 at a single institution. Preoperatively, venous sinus flow was determined by using qMRV, and intravenous pressure was measured during venography. After stenting, intravenous pressure, qMRV flow, and clinical outcomes were assessed and compared.
RESULTS: A mean prestenotic intravenous pressure of 45.2 mm Hg was recorded before stenting, which decreased to 27.4 mm Hg afterward (Wilcoxon signed rank test P = .04). Total jugular outflow on qMRV increased by 260.2 mL/min. Analysis of the change in intravenous pressure and qMRV flow identified a linear relationship (Pearson correlation r = 0.926). All patients displayed visual improvement at 6 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Venous outflow by qMRV increases after endovascular stenting and correlates with significantly improved intravenous pressures. These findings introduce qMRV as a potential adjunct to measure venous flow after stenting, and as a plausible tool in the selection and postoperative surveillance of the patient who has cerebral venous sinus stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25860429      PMCID: PMC4506216          DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  21 in total

1.  Hemodynamic changes following wingspan stent placement--a quantitative magnetic resonance angiography study.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakaran; Kalani R Wells; Miral D Jhaveri; Demetrius K Lopes
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension--reply.

Authors:  Michael Wall; Michael McDermott; Mark Kupersmith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Transarterial embolization of vein of Galen malformations: the use of magnetic resonance imaging noninvasive optimal vessel analysis to quantify shunt reduction. Report of two cases.

Authors:  David J Langer; Joon K Song; Yasunari Niimi; Markus Chwajol; Daniel R Lefton; Jonathan L Brisman; Walter Molofsky; Mark J Kupersmith; Alejandro Berenstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Reconstructive treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulas of the transverse and sigmoid sinus: transvenous angioplasty and stent deployment.

Authors:  T Liebig; H Henkes; S Brew; E Miloslavski; M Kirsch; D Kühne
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography to stratify stroke risk in symptomatic vertebrobasilar disease.

Authors:  Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Xinjian Du; Meide Zhao; Katherine Walsh; Tim W Malisch; Fady T Charbel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Does bilateral transverse cerebral venous sinus stenosis exist in patients without increased intracranial pressure?

Authors:  Linda P Kelly; Amit M Saindane; Beau B Bruce; Maysa A Ridha; Bryan D Riggeal; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Cranial venous outflow obstruction in the pseudotumour syndrome: incidence, nature and relevance.

Authors:  I Johnston; C Kollar; S Dunkley; N Assaad; G Parker
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 8.  Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ross C Puffer; Wessam Mustafa; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  A school of red herring.

Authors:  Peter W MacIntosh; Sachin Jain; Heather E Moss; Nicholas J Volpe; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 10.  An update on the management of pseudotumor cerebri.

Authors:  Michael A Galgano; Eric M Deshaies
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.876

View more
  8 in total

1.  Computational Modeling of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  M R Levitt; P M McGah; K Moon; F C Albuquerque; C G McDougall; M Y S Kalani; L J Kim; A Aliseda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  A systematic review of surgical treatments of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).

Authors:  Aristotelis Kalyvas; Eleftherios Neromyliotis; Christos Koutsarnakis; Spyridon Komaitis; Evangelos Drosos; Georgios P Skandalakis; Mantha Pantazi; Y Pierre Gobin; George Stranjalis; A Patsalides
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Stent Survival and Stent-Adjacent Stenosis Rates following Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hamidreza Saber; Whitfield Lewis; Mahsa Sadeghi; Gary Rajah; Sandra Narayanan
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 4.  Styloidogenic-cervical spondylotic internal jugular venous compression, a vascular disease related to several clinical neurological manifestations: diagnosis and treatment-a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Alba Scerrati; Nicoló Norri; Lorenzo Mongardi; Flavia Dones; Luca Ricciardi; Gianluca Trevisi; Erica Menegatti; Paolo Zamboni; Michele Alessandro Cavallo; Pasquale De Bonis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 5.  Current Status of the Application of Intracranial Venous Sinus Stenting.

Authors:  Kan Xu; Tiecheng Yu; Yongjie Yuan; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Endovascular stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension with venous sinus stenosis.

Authors:  Xinfeng Liu; Hai Di; Jun Wang; Xiangyu Cao; Zhihua Du; Rongju Zhang; Shengyuan Yu; Baomin Li
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 7.  Exploring The Current Management Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension, And Understanding The Role Of Dural Venous Sinus Stenting.

Authors:  Sam P Gurney; Sateesh Ramalingam; Alan Thomas; Alex J Sinclair; Susan P Mollan
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2020-01-14

8.  Utility of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography and non-invasive optimal vessel analysis for identification of complications and long-term hemodynamic changes in post-pipeline embolization patients.

Authors:  Brendan Ryu; Timothy G White; Kevin A Shah; Justin Turpin; Thomas Link; Amir R Dehdashti; Jeffrey M Katz; Karen Black; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 1.764

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.