Literature DB >> 28057635

In Vivo Assessment of the Impact of Regional Intracranial Atherosclerotic Lesions on Brain Arterial 3D Hemodynamics.

C Wu1,2,3, S Schnell2, P Vakil2, A R Honarmand2, S A Ansari2,4, J Carr2, M Markl5,2, S Prabhakaran6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Intracranial atherosclerosis induces hemodynamic disturbance, which is not well-characterized, particularly in cerebral flow redistribution. We aimed to characterize the impact of regional stenotic lesions on intracranial hemodynamics by using 4D flow MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D flow MR imaging was performed in 22 symptomatic patients (mean age, 68.4 ± 14.2 years) with intracranial stenosis (ICA, n = 7; MCA, n = 9; basilar artery, n = 6) and 10 age-appropriate healthy volunteers (mean age, 60.7 ± 8.1 years). 3D blood flow patterns were visualized by using time-integrated pathlines. Blood flow and peak velocity asymmetry indices were compared between patients and healthy volunteers in 4 prespecified arteries: ICAs, MCAs, and anterior/posterior cerebral arteries.
RESULTS: 3D blood flow pathlines demonstrated flow redistribution across cerebral arteries in patients with unilateral intracranial stenosis. For patients with ICA stenosis compared with healthy volunteers, significantly lower flow and peak velocities were identified in the ipsilateral ICA (P = .001 and P = .001) and MCA (P < .001 and P = .001), but higher flow, in the ipsilateral PCA (P < .001). For patients with MCA stenosis, significantly lower flow and peak velocities were observed in the ipsilateral ICA (P = .009 and P = .045) and MCA (P < .001 and P = .005), but significantly higher flow was found in the ipsilateral posterior cerebral artery (P = .014) and anterior cerebral artery (P = .006). The asymmetry indices were not significantly different between patients with basilar artery stenosis and the healthy volunteers.
CONCLUSIONS: Regional intracranial atherosclerotic lesions not only alter distal arterial flow but also significantly affect ipsilateral collateral arterial hemodynamics.
© 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28057635      PMCID: PMC7959995          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  45 in total

1.  Flow-sensitive 4D MRI of the thoracic aorta: comparison of image quality, quantitative flow, and wall parameters at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Christoph Strecker; Andreas Harloff; Wolf Wallis; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Time-resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer; Thomas A Hope; Murat Aksoy; Marcus T Alley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease?

Authors:  Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Max Wintermark; Joey English; Jack Lam; Eric Vittinghoff; Wade S Smith; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Three-vessel study of cerebral blood flow using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of physical characteristics.

Authors:  T Obata; F Shishido; M Koga; H Ikehira; F Kimura; K Yoshida
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  4D UTE flow: a phase-contrast MRI technique for assessment and visualization of stenotic flows.

Authors:  Mo Kadbi; Mj Negahdar; Jung Won Cha; Melanie Traughber; Peter Martin; Marcus F Stoddard; Amir A Amini
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Complex Alterations of Intracranial 4-Dimensional Hemodynamics in Vein of Galen Aneurysmal Malformations During Staged Endovascular Embolization.

Authors:  Can Wu; Samantha E Schoeneman; Ryan Kuhn; Amir R Honarmand; Susanne Schnell; Sameer A Ansari; James Carr; Michael Markl; Ali Shaibani
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.703

7.  Abdominal 4D flow MR imaging in a breath hold: combination of spiral sampling and dynamic compressed sensing for highly accelerated acquisition.

Authors:  Hadrien Dyvorne; Ashley Knight-Greenfield; Guido Jajamovich; Cecilia Besa; Yong Cui; Aurélien Stalder; Michael Markl; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; Michel T Torbey; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The utility of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of intracranial in-stent stenosis.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakaran; Lakshmi Warrior; Kalani R Wells; Miral D Jhaveri; Michael Chen; Demetrius K Lopes
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Sven Petersson; Petter Dyverfeldt; Andreas Sigfridsson; Jonas Lantz; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  4 in total

1.  Highly accelerated intracranial 4D flow MRI: evaluation of healthy volunteers and patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Louise Koskas; Farshid Faraji; Evan Kao; Yan Wang; Henrik Haraldsson; Sarah Kefayati; Chengcheng Zhu; Sinyeob Ahn; Gerhard Laub; David Saloner
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Hemodynamic Analysis of Cerebral AVMs with 3D Phase-Contrast MR Imaging.

Authors:  Y Takeda; T Kin; T Sekine; H Hasegawa; Y Suzuki; H Uchikawa; T Koike; S Kiyofuji; Y Shinya; M Kawashima; N Saito
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Semi-automated analysis of 4D flow MRI to assess the hemodynamic impact of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Alireza Vali; Maria Aristova; Parmede Vakil; Ramez Abdalla; Shyam Prabhakaran; Michael Markl; Sameer A Ansari; Susanne Schnell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI with variable high-venc spatial resolution for neurovascular applications.

Authors:  Maria Aristova; Jianing Pang; Yue Ma; Liliana Ma; Haben Berhane; Vitaliy Rayz; Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 3.737

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.