Literature DB >> 10789428

Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry.

D Alais1, R Blake.   

Abstract

During binocular rivalry, portions of one eye's view may be perceptually dominant while other portions are suppressed; at any given moment, overall dominance often resembles a patchwork mixture of the two eyes' views. This study investigates the potency of two Gestalt grouping cues--good continuation and common fate--to promote synchronous fluctuations in dominance of two, spatially separated rival targets. Two grating patches were presented to the left eye paired dichoptically with random-dot patches presented to corresponding right eye locations. The orientations of the two gratings were either collinear, parallel or orthogonal. Gratings underwent contrast modulations that were either correlated (identical contrast changes) or uncorrelated (independent contrast changes). Over 60 s trials, observers pressed one key when the left grating predominated, another when the right grating predominated and both keys when both were concurrently visible. Correlated contrast modulation promoted joint grating predominance relative to the uncorrelated conditions, an effect strongest for collinear gratings. Joint predominance depended strongly on the angular separation between gratings and the temporal phase-lag in contrast modulations. These findings may reflect neural interactions subserved by lateral connections between cortical hypercolumns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10789428     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00146-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The influence of chromatic context on binocular color rivalry: perception and neural representation.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The monocular-boundary-contour mechanism in binocular surface representation and suppression.

Authors:  Eric A van Bogaert; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Olfaction modulates visual perception in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Yi Jiang; Sheng He; Denise Chen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Multisensory constraints on awareness.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Martin Golubitsky; Yukai Zhao; Yunjiao Wang; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang-Hun Lee; June Kim; David Heeger; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Endogenous spatial attention: evidence for intact functioning in adults with autism.

Authors:  Michael A Grubb; Marlene Behrmann; Ryan Egan; Nancy J Minshew; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.