Literature DB >> 32457469

Adaptation to transients disrupts spatial coherence in binocular rivalry.

Marnix Naber1, Sjoerd Stuit2, Yentl De Kloe2, Stefan Van der Stigchel2, Chris L E Paffen2.   

Abstract

When one eye is presented with an image that is distinct from the image presented to the other eye, the eyes start to rival and suppress each other's image. Binocular rivalry leads to perceptual alternations between the images of each eye, during which only one of the images is perceived at a time. However, when the eyes exert weak and shallow suppression, participants tend to perceive both images intermixed more often. A recent study proposed that the precedence of mixed percepts positively correlates with the degree of adaptation to conflict between the eyes. However, this study neglected the role of visual transients, which covaried with the degree of conflict in the stimulus design. Here we report that not the conflict between the eyes but prolonged and repeated observations of strong visual transients cause participants to report more mixed percepts. We conclude that visual transients, such as sudden changes in contrast, draw attention, strengthen both eyes' image representations, and facilitate the adaptation to interocular suppression, which consequentially disrupts the spatial coherence in binocular rivalry. This finding is relevant to virtual- and augmented reality for which it is crucial to design stereoscopic environments in which binocular rivalry is limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32457469      PMCID: PMC7251118          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65678-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  52 in total

1.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Visual competition.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Gene R Stoner; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Linda C Mayes; Robert T Schultz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Attention speeds binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

Review 6.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Frank Tong; Ming Meng; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Symbolic magnitude modulates perceptual strength in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Sarah Plukaard; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-02-12

Review 8.  The 'laws' of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt's propositions.

Authors:  J W Brascamp; P C Klink; W J M Levelt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Inattention abolishes binocular rivalry: perceptual evidence.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-08-28

10.  Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Jens Sommer; Andreas Jansen; Marnix Naber; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  After-image formation by adaptation to dynamic color gradients.

Authors:  Marieke S Alzeer; Kiki Houwers; Maarten van de Smagt; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Marnix Naber
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.