Literature DB >> 20880042

Getting physicians to respond: the impact of incentive type and timing on physician survey response rates.

Katherine M James1, Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss, Jon C Tilburt, Ann M Harris, Timothy J Beebe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of payment timing, form of payment, and requiring a social security number (SSN) on survey response rates. DATA SOURCE: Third-wave mailing of a U.S. physician survey. STUDY
DESIGN: Nonrespondents were randomized to receive immediate U.S.$25 cash, immediate U.S.$25 check, promised U.S.$25 check, or promised U.S.$25 check requiring an SSN. DATA COLLECTION
METHODS: Paper survey responses were double entered into statistical software. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Response rates differed significantly between remuneration groups (χ(3) (2) = 80.1, p<.0001), with the highest rate in the immediate cash group (34 percent), then immediate check (20 percent), promised check (10 percent), and promised check with SSN (8 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate monetary incentives yield higher response rates than promised in this population of nonresponding physicians. Promised incentives yield similarly low response rates regardless of whether an SSN is requested. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880042      PMCID: PMC3034272          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01181.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  11 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  The effects of variations in mode of delivery and monetary incentive on physicians' responses to a mailed survey assessing STD practice patterns.

Authors:  D Kasprzyk; D E Montaño; J S St Lawrence; W R Phillips
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires.

Authors:  S M Cummings; L A Savitz; T R Konrad
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  Shawn R McMahon; Martha Iwamoto; Mehran S Massoudi; Hussain R Yusuf; John M Stevenson; Felicita David; Susan Y Chu; Larry K Pickering
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Physician response rates to a telephone survey: effects of monetary incentive level.

Authors:  W J Gunn; I N Rhodes
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  1981

6.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan B VanGeest; Timothy P Johnson; Verna L Welch
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Twenty-five years of health surveys: does more data mean better data?

Authors:  Marc L Berk; Claudia L Schur; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Alan M Zaslavsky; Judy Goldstein; Dee W West; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives.

Authors:  D A Asch; N A Christakis; P A Ubel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  31 in total

1.  Canadian national survey of family medicine residents on point-of-care ultrasound training.

Authors:  Shuo Peng; Taft Micks; David Braganza; Kyle Sue; Michael Woo; Peter Rogers; Sarah Freedman; John Lewis; Shirley Hu; Catherine Varner; Nisarg Patel; Saadia Hameed; Peter Steinmetz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A randomized trial of the impact of survey design characteristics on response rates among nursing home providers.

Authors:  Melissa Clark; Michelle Rogers; Andrew Foster; Faye Dvorchak; Frances Saadeh; Jessica Weaver; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Physician mothers' experience of workplace discrimination: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Meghan C Halley; Alison S Rustagi; Jeanette S Torres; Elizabeth Linos; Victoria Plaut; Christina Mangurian; Esther Choo; Eleni Linos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-12

4.  Referral Patterns and Training Needs in Psychiatry among Primary Care Physicians in Canadian Rural/Remote Areas.

Authors:  Margaret Steele; Richard Zayed; Brenda Davidson; Neal Stretch; Lucie Nadeau; William Fleisher; Tamison Doey; Helen R Spenser; Sabina Abidi; Geneviève Auclair; Terrence S Callanan; Don Duncan; Gisele Ferguson; Roberta Flynn; Lindsay Hope-Ross; Sarosh Khalid-Khan; Lorraine Lazier; Vitaly Liashko; Harold Lipton; Lara Postl; Kimberly St John
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05

5.  Qualitative responses to a national physician survey on HPV vaccination.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Devin Murphy; Maria Rodriguez; Teri L Malo; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Internists' attitudes about assessing and maintaining clinical competence.

Authors:  Thomas H Gallagher; Carolyn D Prouty; Douglas M Brock; Joshua M Liao; Arlene Weissman; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Provider perceptions of the electronic health record incentive programs: a survey of eligible professionals who have and have not attested to meaningful use.

Authors:  Douglas L Weeks; Benjamin J Keeney; Peggy C Evans; Quincy D Moore; Douglas A Conrad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Tilak U Shah; Corrine I Voils; Rebecca McNeil; Richard Wu; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Use of biomarker testing in lung cancer among Puerto Rico and Florida Physicians: Results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Teresita Muñoz-Antonia; Vani N Simmons; Steven K Sutton; Matthew B Schabath; Iffat Alam; Alberto Chiappori; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Pathw       Date:  2019-10

10.  Effect of Small Monetary Incentive and Demographic Characteristics on Response Rate of Self-Administered Questionnaire Mailed to Rural Women.

Authors:  Lacey A McCormack
Journal:  Online J Rural Res Policy       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.