Literature DB >> 11233582

The effects of variations in mode of delivery and monetary incentive on physicians' responses to a mailed survey assessing STD practice patterns.

D Kasprzyk1, D E Montaño, J S St Lawrence, W R Phillips.   

Abstract

High response rates from physicians are key to obtaining valid and generalizable data regarding their sexually transmitted disease (STD) diagnosis, treatment, and control practices. A factorial (3 x 2) study was designed using varying cash incentives ($0, $15, $25) and delivery modes (Federal Express, U.S. mail). Surveys, with three follow-up mailings, were sent to a national probability sample of 311 physicians in OB-GYN, family practice, internal and emergency medicine, and pediatrics specialties. Overall, 156 physicians returned completed surveys (56% overall response rate). Significant effects for incentive level (F = 28.2, df = 2, p < .01) and delivery mode (F = 4.1, df = 1, p < .05) existed. Highest response was among physicians in the $25-FedEx condition (81%). High response rates from busy practicing physicians can be achieved if surveys are relevant to clinical practice, sponsored by a reputable organization (the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), include a monetary incentive, and are delivered by courier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11233582     DOI: 10.1177/01632780122034740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  12 in total

1.  Assessing diabetes practices in clinical settings: precursor to building community partnerships around disease management.

Authors:  John D Prochaska; Nelda Mier; Jane N Bolin; Kerrie L Hora; Heather R Clark; Marcia G Ory
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-12

2.  Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Ellen Funkhouser; Kavya Vellala; Camille Baltuck; Rita Cacciato; Emily Durand; Deborah McEdward; Ellen Sowell; Sarah E Theisen; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Paying research participants: a study of current practices in Australia.

Authors:  C L Fry; A Ritter; S Baldwin; K J Bowen; P Gardiner; T Holt; R Jenkinson; J Johnston
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Getting physicians to respond: the impact of incentive type and timing on physician survey response rates.

Authors:  Katherine M James; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Jon C Tilburt; Ann M Harris; Timothy J Beebe
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Pediatricians' knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors regarding car booster seats.

Authors:  Faith Yingling; Heather A Stombaugh; James Jeffrey; Frankie B LaPorte; Michael F Oswanski
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-02

6.  Prevalence of industry support and its relationship to research integrity.

Authors:  Patricia M Tereskerz; Ann B Hamric; Thomas M Guterbock; Jonathan D Moreno
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Gift card incentives and non-response bias in a survey of vaccine providers: the role of geographic and demographic factors.

Authors:  Joshua Van Otterloo; Jennifer L Richards; Katherine Seib; Paul Weiss; Saad B Omer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Infant male circumcision: healthcare provider knowledge and associated factors.

Authors:  Erin J Starzyk; Michele A Kelley; Rachel N Caskey; Alan Schwartz; Joan F Kennelly; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  Diabetes in rural towns: effectiveness of continuing education and feedback for healthcare providers in altering diabetes outcomes at a population level: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine L Paul; Leon Piterman; Jonathan Shaw; Catherine Kirby; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Mariko L Carey; Jennifer Robinson; Patrick McElduff; Isaraporn Thepwongsa
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.