Literature DB >> 24297666

Internists' attitudes about assessing and maintaining clinical competence.

Thomas H Gallagher1, Carolyn D Prouty, Douglas M Brock, Joshua M Liao, Arlene Weissman, Eric S Holmboe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Important changes are occurring in how the medical profession approaches assessing and maintaining competence. Physician support for such changes will be essential for their success.
OBJECTIVE: To describe physician attitudes towards assessing and maintaining competence.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional internet survey. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 1,000 American College of Physicians members who were eligible to participate in the American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification program. MAIN MEASURES: Questions assessed physicians' attitudes and experiences regarding: 1) self-regulation, 2) feedback on knowledge and clinical care, 3) demonstrating knowledge and clinical competence, 4) frequency of use and effectiveness of methods to assess or improve clinical care, and 5) transparency. KEY
RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 446 of 943 eligible respondents (47%). Eighty percent reported it was important (somewhat/very) to receive feedback on their knowledge, and 94% considered it important (somewhat/very) to get feedback on their quality of care. However, only 24% reported that they receive useful feedback on their knowledge most/all of the time, and 27% reported receiving useful feedback on their clinical care most/all of the time. Seventy-five percent agreed that participating in programs to assess their knowledge is important to staying up-to-date, yet only 52% reported participating in such programs within the last 3 years. The majority (58%) believed physicians should be required to demonstrate their knowledge via a secure examination every 9-10 years. Support was low for Specialty Certification Boards making information about physician competence publically available, with respondents expressing concern about patients misinterpreting information about their Board Certification activities.
CONCLUSIONS: A gap exists between physicians' interest in feedback on their competence and existing programs' ability to provide such feedback. Educating physicians about the importance of regularly assessing their knowledge and quality of care, coupled with enhanced systems to provide such feedback, is needed to close this gap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297666      PMCID: PMC3965737          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2706-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  Physician board certification and the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Saif S Rathore; Yongfei Wang; Martha J Radford; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Measure, learn, and improve: physicians' involvement in quality improvement.

Authors:  Anne-Marie J Audet; Michelle M Doty; Jamil Shamasdin; Stephen C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback.

Authors:  Gro Jamtvedt; Jane M Young; Doris T Kristoffersen; Mary Ann O'Brien; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

4.  Assessing quality of care: knowledge matters.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Rebecca Lipner; Ann Greiner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The impact of a preventive cardiology quality improvement intervention on residents and clinics: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Bernabeo; Lisa N Conforti; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  'To call or not to call': making informed self-assessment.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  The power of feedback.

Authors:  John Norcini
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  "I'll never play professional football" and other fallacies of self-assessment.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Teaching and evaluating point of care learning with an Internet-based clinical-question portfolio.

Authors:  Michael L Green; Siddharta G Reddy; Eric Holmboe
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review.

Authors:  David A Davis; Paul E Mazmanian; Michael Fordis; R Van Harrison; Kevin E Thorpe; Laure Perrier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Capsule commentary on Gallagher et al., Internists' attitudes about assessing and maintaining clinical competence.

Authors:  Danette Waller McKinley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Maintaining competence in general internal medicine.

Authors:  Mitchell D Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.